Close

Results 1 to 30 of 72

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Moderator belgareth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Lower Slovobia
    Posts
    7,961
    Rep Power
    8567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tribal View Post
    By Tisha23

    "Another reason neroli was chosen is because they know that people want to use there own scents sometimes. Neroli

    blends with just about anything. Foody scents, Musky scents, florals. It dosnt alter the cover scent. Many perfumers

    use it, not as part of the scent but because it is so diffusive and can create more sillage (vapor trial) for there

    perfume formulas. Sillage is important, it carries the mones around the targets and gently creates that pull to

    you
    . "
    I see. In my personal opinion, I don't think she knows what she is talking about. Of

    course, I do reserve the right to be wrong. However, mones create their own cloud which likely mixes with any other

    scents but I do not believe that the scent does anything to carry the mones.
    To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.

    Thomas Jefferson

  2. #2
    Banned User
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    44
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Response From Dial

    Mr.

    (XXXXX)
    Page 1

    October 13, 2009

    Dear Mr. (XXXXX):

    Thank you for taking the time to contact

    us regarding a cleansing product we manufacture.

    Unfortunately, the percentages of ingredients is proprietary

    information and not available for dissemination.

    Thank you again for contacting us.

    Consumer

    Affairs


    If you should need to contact us again regarding this matter please refer to the following

    contact number:
    XXXXX

    PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. THE MAILBOX IS USED FOR OUTBOUND EMAILS

    ONLY.

    I didn't think they'd release any extra information but it was worth a shot. I agree w/ you Bel, a

    distribution of this magnitude would have to be from another lab, maybe their own. Of course putting

    .000000000001ncg of A1 in the soap could justify their claims of being "pheromone infused". Only testing will

    tell.

  3. #3
    Phero Guru Rbt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Midwest US
    Posts
    1,579
    Rep Power
    7247

    Default

    I gave the product a shot during my

    shower this morning. About the only immediate reaction is that I don't like the "slimey" feel that many body

    washes, including this one, seem to leave behind. I guess it's done on the basis that it makes it feel like you

    have softer skin, but to me it was uncomfortable and I rinsed a lot longer than usual to try to minimize the feel.



    Scent-wise it was okay, pretty much faded down as expected to near nothing by afternoon.

    As for pheromone

    effects? Who knows... I'd have to test it for a lot longer and in more diverse situations, along with a "control"

    product (non-pheromone enhanced).

    So far, as far as I'm concerned, it's just a basic body wash product. Only

    time will tell. If it tells at all.
    Last edited by Rbt; 10-13-2009 at 05:12 PM.
    The opposite of love isn't hate.
    It's apathy
    .

  4. #4
    Moderator belgareth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Lower Slovobia
    Posts
    7,961
    Rep Power
    8567

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peregrine View Post
    I

    didn't think they'd release any extra information but it was worth a shot. I agree w/ you Bel, a distribution of

    this magnitude would have to be from another lab, maybe their own. Of course putting .000000000001ncg of A1 in the

    soap could justify their claims of being "pheromone infused". Only testing will tell.
    I agree as

    well. One thing I will note is the ingredients are listed from largest to smallest. So, there is more A1 than

    preservatives but less than the salt content. At least that gives us some information. Though the amount of

    stabilizers and preservatives is not a lot, the pheromone content should be enough to be active. I'm not in any way

    a chemist but have worked with some organic compounds that required perservative and have something of a feel for

    it.

    I'd agree about the bond too but am too weak in chemistry to really be certain if it would happen or not.
    To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.

    Thomas Jefferson

  5. #5
    Banned User
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    44
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by belgareth View Post
    I

    see. In my personal opinion, I don't think she knows what she is talking about. Of course, I do reserve the right

    to be wrong. However, mones create their own cloud which likely mixes with any other scents but I do not believe

    that the scent does anything to carry the mones.
    To me, in order for the scent to "carry" the

    pheromones, the molecules would have to form a bond. I can't speak on the molecular stability of synthetic

    pheromones. A study conducted by the EPA called "Polar Organic Compounds In Fragrances Of Consumers" claims the

    tested fragrances contained ninety percent of the chemicals listed in the EPA's hazardous waste list. That's a lot

    of molecules that could possibly carry or even break down pheromones. Keep in mind I'm not a chemist.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •