That plan is still open to debate,
and who knows where the final plan will go. Like KK said, a big part of the problem of this plan is new buyers v.
existing owners. And as Bruce touched on, there's not a lot of willingness for anyone to act in the home market
now. The current plan disqualifies refinancing of existing mortgages, which is both good and bad, depending on how
viable the refinance is. Which is pretty darned hard to prove to the banks these days. The main problem with this
whole gov't bailout scenario of gov't. They don't do anything right.
Unless your assets are $700 billion
and/or irresponsibly unlimited. If you have those kind of funds you can tell anyone you want to go to hell, then,
after mismanaging your public trust, sanctimoniously shift blame for the problem and find new and more creative ways
to keep your position.
Offering a plan to new buyers at historically low rates might sell some homes, but then
again might exacerbate the problem that exists. After all, most of the housing problems we have now is low rates,
gov't programs (see Freddie and Fanny, see Chris Dodd) and easy money driving unqualified buyers into the
market.
All of that is moot if you consider the inevitable outcome of the plan. The US gov't will have de facto
ownership of private homes. This is so far beyond the Freddie and Fanny bailouts (bad enough) and is part of a
dangerous trend toward gov't ownership of private assets either through loans or direct investment. An ugly door
was opened when the financial companies were given carte blanche to gov't (our) funds to save their asses. The
message was sent that access to the public (our's again) debt is available to the rich and poor alike.
Responsibility has long left gov't, and now business, at our own behest.
I don't like it one bit, any of
it.
Don't even get me started on the Detroit (read Union, read private entitlement) problems. Or Organized
Labor's (read "show me the money") drive to eliminate private voting for membership. Who wants the 9.99 DVD
bargain bin to be 20.99?
Bookmarks