As an aside, I believe that
any gender gap in math and science is a social and not biological issue, just like the racial gap. Also, gender
roles are as much (or more, although no matter what my parents told me, I won't be able to give birth ) social
as they are biological.
An article that refers to the story I mentioned above (and evidence that I don't just
go around making stuff up):
http://www.iwf.org/issues/issues_detail.asp?Artic
leID=592
"Journalist John Colapinto also offers evidence that human sexual identity is not a social
construct. Indeed, Tom Wolfe has said that Colapinto's shocking book, As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who was Raised
as a Girl (HarperCollins), "stands as exhibit A" against the idea that nurture is more important than nature. It
is the heartbreaking story of a baby boy whom an ambitious doctor changed into a girl."
Interesting
excerpt:
"This illustrates a point often made by the iconoclastic feminist Camille Paglia: that men are happy in
what Paglia calls "People Free Zones." Paglia speaks of the object-loving male mind. Males, young and old, are less
interested in talking about their feelings and personal relationships than are women and girls. In an experiment at
Northeastern University, the conversations of college students in the cafeteria were secretly recorded. Women were
found to be vastly more likely to talk about intimates, close friends, boyfriends, and family members than boys
were.
In another study, researchers presented male and female students with two images simultaneously through a
stereoscope and asked them to say what they saw. The male subjects saw objects far more often than they saw people;
the reverse was true for the female students. Dozens of experiments confirm that women are much better than men at
judging emotions in a stranger's face. Men are slightly better at spatial reasoning. Females are better at verbal
skills. Well, why should this be the case?
A growing body of evidence confirms the experience of parents and
the wisdom of the ages that there are basic differences between the sexes, partic-ularly in preferences and
behavior, which are innate, hard-wired, and not the result of social conditioning. In the past few years, there have
been some exciting developments in neuroscience, genetics, endocrinology, and even evolutionary psychology,
pinpointing the biological correlates of some typical gender differences."
Interesting studies:
Gender gap in letters to Santa Claus:
http://people.morehead-st.edu/fs/s.reilley/Santa2.pdf#search='boys%20girls%20psychological%20 study%20toy
s%20gender'
Gender gap in toys:
http://www.stanford.edu/~zozo/gap/childhood/toys.html
Parental influence on gender roles:
http://gozips.uakron.edu/~susan8/parinf.htm
The
balancing act of nature vs. nurture:
http://reason.com/9903/fe.cy.sex.shtml
Again, I
would be the last to say that men and women are vastly different, but I'm not ignorant enough to say that they're
the same just because some activists forget the difference between equity and equality (aka being the same
(equality) vs. having equal rights, opportunities and potential (equity); I hope I have those correct).
Bookmarks