Everyone\'s getting a Penn State psychology minor from reading all of my posts...only

you didn\'t pay $7K/semester to go to these classes...

[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

From the Matching Hypothesis

Thread:

</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font

class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
does it die

if i don\'t wear the pheromones? that\'s hard to say. i think pheromones can also cause a sort of bonding that

wouldn\'t just melt away when you stop using them. but i think this is highly dependant on the type of product one

is using. more sexual products like npa/te tend in my opinion to create relationships that will die if you don\'t

use the pheros anymore. on the other hand, wagg is much more bonding, and i think it creates a lasting bonding that

wouldn\'t die (at least not so fast) if you stop using it.
i use different products on purpose with different

women according to what sort of relationship i am looking for. if i just want something quick and sexual that

wouldn\'t last long, i would mostly use te. if i want something longer and deeper with feelings, i would use

something which is less heavy on none and has a considerable amount of nol, something like attraction maybe, and

then also wagg.

<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

Why can\'t you use both, ie a lot of nol

and te, for sexual and bonding? Do you find that amounts are unimportant, but rather ratios between the sexual and

bonding pheromones make the difference?

<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

well if i want the

sexual relationship, i might also use some nol to make things more relaxed. but if i want something lasting, i would

not use te/npa even not with a lot of nol. at least not at the begining when the relationships is in creation. when

i wear te/npa (even with other products) i feel that takes out the wild side in the woman and make almost all other

sides disappear. i feel that she herself wants me just for the sex. this is something on which one cannot build a

lasting relationship. a few months max. then you have to have other things in the relationship which i feel are lost

with te/npa. but this is just my experience, it could be different for others.
markus


<hr

/></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

This is an interesting argument. Why? Because it touches on

Sternberg\'s Triangular Model:

(Note: sorry if this looks funny, but it\'s the only way I could get it to

keep the shape of a friggin\' triangle...

[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img])

|___________________Intimacy
|______________________/\

\
|_____________________/-- \\
|_____________Passion_/____\\ Commitment

The model shows three

aspects to love: Intimacy, Passion, and Commitment.

Nonlove: Casual Interactions
Intimacy only = Liking;

Friendships
Passion only = Infatuation; \"Love at first sight\", sexual attraction
Commitment only = Empty

Love; \"Staying together for the kids\"
Intimacy + Passion = Romantic Love; Summer fling
Intimacy +

Commitment = Companionate Love; Passionless Marriage, Older couples, Lifetime companionship
Passion + Commitment

= Fatuous Love; \"Whirlwind Courtship\" (best recent example: Bennifer: Passion and engagement to be married, but

too much media-frenzy to get close)
Intimacy + Passion + Commitment = Consumate Love; Complete Love, Most

difficult to attain


Now, I think most people would argue that pheromones in this model would be a

passion jumpstart (much like myself [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]) in this example. This

allows for the sexual chemistry/attraction to skyrocket between people. Now, I believe the above argument would say

that sexual -mones such as TE would be more likely to crank up the passion and allow for some major sexual hits...

However, when they wear off, it is likely that the passion may dissipate, which would lead to nothing being there to

keep the flame burning. On the other hand, using WAGG may allow for an intimacy overhaul where the closeness

between the two people can be increased as well as any passion that may be there. Therefore, if the passion fades

slightly from the removal of -mones from the pictures, you will still have that intimacy that you developed before,

thus leading to a better chance at a solid relationship. I believe that is what the argument above was trying to

say using the terms of this model.

One may also argue that TE or similar products will increase the passion,

and with your charm, wit, and intelligence can allow you to develop the intimacy, etc. needed to build a serious

relationship. However, the previous argument would say that this is harder due to the fact that you don\'t have

any assistance of \"intimacy\" -mones.

Question: How do you feel one can use knowledge of the Triangular

Model to your advantage? Do you think you can attempt to \"jumpstart\" a relationship by combining -mones and

your clever wit to develop a better relationship with an attractive man/woman?

Does this help anyone use

their -mones more effectively, or am I just wasting my time?

I hope this brings some more help to people

regarding -mone use...


[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]Pancho

[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]