Ever since Winnifred Cutler said (on a TV talk show) that Athena 10:13 contained dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and that a pheromone for men would not work (because it\'s the men who pursue women, not vice versa) she has continued to lose credibility. She didn\'t have that much credibility to start with--as should be obvious by such statements above. From that point on, she claimed that the active ingredient in Athena 10:13 was a secret, due to patent concerns (circa 1994). Gee, it\'s taken her a long time to get a patent, hasn\'t it? I think this attests to a complete lack of evidence to support that whatever she wants to call a pheromone is patentable--or that it\'s a pheromone.
Some people may recall, however, that she published an article in Archives of Sexual Behavior a few years back, and was granted some credibility due to this publication. What most people don\'t know is that Chuck Wysocki and George Preti (who worked with Cutler at Monell) promptly responded to her publication with an extremely cutting diatribe that made Cutler look foolish.
Bookmarks