Close

Results 1 to 26 of 26
  1. #1
    Phero Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    321
    Rep Power
    7681

    Default The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    visit-red-300x50PNG
    OK:
    MIX 1= SOE : NPA/m : NPA/w : PI at 6:2:2:1
    MIX 2= WAGG : NPA/m : NPA/w : PI at 4:2:2:1

    I have a feeling

    these are killer mixes

    time for testing, I get npa/w in a few days!
    any thoughts?!

  2. #2
    Sadhu bjf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    3,781
    Rep Power
    8213

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    OK:
    MIX 1= SOE : NPA/m : NPA/w : PI

    at 6:2:2:1
    MIX 2= WAGG : NPA/m : NPA/w : PI at 4:2:2:1

    I have a feeling these are killer mixes

    time for

    testing, I get npa/w in a few days!
    any thoughts?!

    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    Number 2

    doesn\'t seem right. Don\'t think you need that much wagg at all.

  3. #3
    Phero Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    833
    Rep Power
    7774

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    geee MIX 2 looks very similar to my old mix [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

  4. #4
    Bad Motha Holmes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,004
    Rep Power
    8021

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    That\'s a really good mix.


    Holmes

  5. #5
    Sadhu
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    I´don´t know I lost my compass,you have to go and check my old profile
    Posts
    3,759
    Rep Power
    8578

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    Why do you want to use both NPAs pico? Any particular reason?

  6. #6
    Phero Dude
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    466
    Rep Power
    7537

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    I agree. I choose SOE in lieu of NPA/W. Or even better jsut use less NPA and save some $. I think those

    that getting the women version are wasting money.

  7. #7
    Phero Dude OCP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    576
    Rep Power
    7551

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    I agree. I choose SOE in lieu of NPA/W.

    Or even better jsut use less NPA and save some $. I think those that getting the women version are wasting money.



    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    Why? Is NPA/w basically SOE under another name?

    [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

  8. #8
    Phero Dude
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    466
    Rep Power
    7537

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    No. I just think the nol &amp; other ingredients in SOE would work better attracting women than a

    product like NPA/W which is designed to attract men

  9. #9
    Sadhu
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    I´don´t know I lost my compass,you have to go and check my old profile
    Posts
    3,759
    Rep Power
    8578

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    here we go again...... it doesn´t matter which version you use! Moners need to understand this.
    I´m

    just thinking that picos suggested mixes may be too strong. Very heavy on the none. Do you reckon that you need a

    good amount of none pico? Remember that SOE also contains rone and rone enhances the effects of nol and none. SO

    when mixing with strong none products such as both NPAs or PI it would be a better idea to go lighter on these. If

    you need more you can always increase the dose.

  10. #10
    Phero Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    321
    Rep Power
    7681

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    Ok in reply:

    to bjf: wagg works wonders in neutralising the none and making it friendly. Do you

    think 4 is unneccessary?? I\'ver used lots of wagg before always with good results

    holmes: which mix is really

    good...thanks for the compliment

    CJ01: well npa/m and npa/w really complement each other (apparently from what

    i\'ve read) at 1:1 ratio. npa/w contains another secret ingredient that npa/m doesn\'t, and with Bruce\'s new

    wacky wednesday thing, I\'ve ordered two bottles of npa/w (i\'ve got 5 bottles of npa/m already!!!)

    bigdog:

    npa/w is very different from SOE, and npa is relatively cheap, especially with the current wacky wednesday offer

    (will you please stop tempting me bruce! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

    [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img])


  11. #11
    Phero Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    321
    Rep Power
    7681

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    OK: here are the percentages of mix 1,
    that is, 6 SOE : 2 Npa/m : 2Npa/w : 1Pi
    None =

    44.6%
    Nol = 44.3%
    Rone = 11.1%

    these were calculated with the pheromone mix calculator (i assumed npa/m

    and npa/w had the same amount of none.

    so as we can see, this mix is very well balanced, with equal amounts

    of nol and none, and a small amount of rone.

    I will be able to test this mix in a few days....oh yeah! bring

    it on [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

    CJ, you said that rone enhances the effect of none

    and nol. Well I could use a different ratio by upping the SOE slightly....
    also I use soe gel packs, and 6 drops

    of SOE equals 1 gel pack.
    Therefore I will make the mix of 2Npa/w:2Npa/m:1Pi and use three drops of this per

    application with a whole SOE gel pack.
    what do you think? does this sound right? thanks a million...

  12. #12
    Bodhi Satva CptKipling's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,142
    Rep Power
    8529

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    The second person to post that mix this week! (unless posted it before)

  13. #13
    Sadhu bjf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    3,781
    Rep Power
    8213

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    Ok in reply:

    to bjf: wagg works

    wonders in neutralising the none and making it friendly. Do you think 4 is unneccessary?? I\'ver used lots of wagg

    before always with good results



    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    Pico, in some of the

    reading I have done, it seems like some people were thinking at a certain point adding a lot is pointless. Some

    even believe in adding a dab or two - less than a drop - to their mix.

    In my experimentations with it, it

    really is hard to understand what is doing what, there are so many variables. But I\'m still inclined to believe

    it is better as a smaller component of the mix, though I am sure mxes with it as a base can get good hits too.




    Also, the calculator is all wrong about Lacroy products, as they are only half none.

  14. #14
    Phero Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    833
    Rep Power
    7774

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    Do a search under me, frenchie or proteus We have experimented tons with npa/w and it has proven

    results (for us anyways) A 1:1 ratio is best with added WAGG, I used to use PI/m but found out by adding an extra

    dab or 2 or 3 of NPA/m is better than using PI/m,

    Right now my killer mixes with restuls are:

    1 spray of Heat,

    1 spray of Te/w (On upper chest) 1 dab of heat on chin with 2 drops of AE/M (behind ears)

    Also

    Heat &amp; Te/w

    1 spray to each pit plus 2-3 drops of WAGG

  15. #15
    Bodhi Satva CptKipling's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,142
    Rep Power
    8529

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    WAGG is very hard to use in a complex mix; NPA and WAGG is ok; NPAm/w and WAGG is ok; but anything else

    is more complicated.

    I think there is too much WAGG aswell, 2 or 3 would be better.

  16. #16
    Phero Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    833
    Rep Power
    7774

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    WAGG is very hard to use in a complex

    mix

    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    Im not sure what you meant by this, but I guess at either



    A) your suggesting its best applied separately
    B) or your like me and dont like the wagg+nol combo?

    I did

    try the wkm version with wagg minus the SoE mixed up and I wasnt to happy with the results

    I really like wagg,

    but I cant have it applied anywhere within direct breathing range, and when its all mixed up you almost have to hit

    the pulse points in neck/chin area

  17. #17
    Phero Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    833
    Rep Power
    7774

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    IIRC Npa/w contains A LOT less none from the male version

  18. #18
    Phero Dude OCP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    576
    Rep Power
    7551

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    Do a search under me, frenchie or

    proteus We have experimented tons with npa/w and it has proven results (for us anyways) A 1:1 ratio is best with

    added WAGG, I used to use PI/m but found out by adding an extra dab or 2 or 3 of NPA/m is better than using PI/m,




    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    I think I understand, but to be clear are you saying that 3 dabs

    of NPA is better than 1 drop of PI/m? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

  19. #19
    Sadhu bjf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    3,781
    Rep Power
    8213

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    IIRC Npa/w contains A LOT less none

    from the male version

    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    Definitely!!!

  20. #20
    Phero Dude
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    466
    Rep Power
    7537

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    I just don\'t see WAGG and NPA/w as being very successful attracting women sexually. I have had

    better success with SOE with women than WAGG. WAGG seems more to make guys comfortable, and often too comfortable,

    with me. With friends I use WAGG but not at bars. TE,NPA,AE much better for me attracting women sexually. Also

    adding SOE at times.

  21. #21
    Phero Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    833
    Rep Power
    7774

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    </font><blockquote><font

    class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    Do a search under me, frenchie or proteus We have experimented tons with

    npa/w and it has proven results (for us anyways) A 1:1 ratio is best with added WAGG, I used to use PI/m but

    found out by adding an extra dab or 2 or 3 of NPA/m is better than using PI/m,


    <hr /></blockquote><font

    class=\"post\">

    I think I understand, but to be clear are you saying that 3 dabs of NPA is better than 1 drop

    of PI/m? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    For

    me yes, I used to love PI that was untill i started experimenting with lacroys products. npa/te is proven for raw

    sexual hits.

  22. #22
    Phero Dude OCP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    576
    Rep Power
    7551

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    </font><blockquote><font

    class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    Do a search

    under me, frenchie or proteus We have experimented tons with npa/w and it has proven results (for us anyways) A

    1:1 ratio is best with added WAGG, I used to use PI/m but found out by adding an extra dab or 2 or 3 of NPA/m is

    better than using PI/m,


    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    I think I understand, but to be clear

    are you saying that 3 dabs of NPA is better than 1 drop of PI/m? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]



    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    For me yes, I used to love PI that was untill i started

    experimenting with lacroys products. npa/te is proven for raw sexual hits.

    <hr /></blockquote><font

    class=\"post\">

    What do you think of 1 drop PI/m and 3 dabs of NPA/m with either SOE or WAGG? Too much NONE?


  23. #23
    Sadhu
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    I´don´t know I lost my compass,you have to go and check my old profile
    Posts
    3,759
    Rep Power
    8578

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    CJ, you said that rone enhances the

    effect of none and nol. Well I could use a different ratio by upping the SOE slightly....
    also I use soe gel

    packs, and 6 drops of SOE equals 1 gel pack.
    Therefore I will make the mix of 2Npa/w:2Npa/m:1Pi and use three

    drops of this per application with a whole SOE gel pack.
    what do you think? does this sound right? thanks a

    million...



    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\"> pico, a different ratio is a good idea but I´d start

    without the PI. NPA is very strong none already plus the èxtra´ingredients and PI seems almost pointless, PI/w

    would be better I reckon. Do let us know when you tried whatever mix though.
    I hope you got the unscented SOE.

    I´d start with half a pack and if you feel you need more you can use the rest to freshen up and also spread it well.

    [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

  24. #24
    Phero Pro
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    833
    Rep Power
    7774

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    </font><blockquote><font

    class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr

    />
    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    Do a search under me, frenchie or proteus We

    have experimented tons with npa/w and it has proven results (for us anyways) A 1:1 ratio is best with added WAGG,

    I used to use PI/m but found out by adding an extra dab or 2 or 3 of NPA/m is better than using PI/m,


    <hr

    /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    I think I understand, but to be clear are you saying that 3 dabs of NPA is

    better than 1 drop of PI/m? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

    <hr /></blockquote><font

    class=\"post\">

    For me yes, I used to love PI that was untill i started experimenting with lacroys products.

    npa/te is proven for raw sexual hits.

    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    What do you think of 1 drop

    PI/m and 3 dabs of NPA/m with either SOE or WAGG? Too much NONE?

    <hr /></blockquote><font

    class=\"post\">

    well 4 dabs = 1 drop so just do 1 drop of npa with whatevr u like then.

    I cant say if its to

    much or to little, we each have our own limits along with different body chemestry.

    What mix have you used which

    yielded you with the best results application wise?

  25. #25
    Sadhu bjf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    3,781
    Rep Power
    8213

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    </font><blockquote><font

    class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    CJ, you said that rone enhances the effect of none and nol. Well I could use

    a different ratio by upping the SOE slightly....
    also I use soe gel packs, and 6 drops of SOE equals 1 gel pack.


    Therefore I will make the mix of 2Npa/w:2Npa/m:1Pi and use three drops of this per application with a whole SOE

    gel pack.
    what do you think? does this sound right? thanks a million...



    <hr /></blockquote><font

    class=\"post\"> pico, a different ratio is a good idea but I´d start without the PI. NPA is very strong none

    already plus the èxtra´ingredients and PI seems almost pointless, PI/w would be better I reckon. Do let us know

    when you tried whatever mix though.
    I hope you got the unscented SOE. I´d start with half a pack and if you feel

    you need more you can use the rest to freshen up and also spread it well.

    [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    Yea,

    sometimes whipping up all sorts of products has diminishing returns.

    My guess with Lacroy\'s 1:1 ratio is

    that they wanted a minimum amount of secret ingredients on you say if you choose to wear .005 none. However, for

    people choosing to wear .015 none, having .015 secret ingredients isn\'t necessarily beneficial. You may not need

    all those secret ingredients and someone once posted something from Lacroy saying it was easy to OD on the secrets

    and no more than four dabs of TE was needed (which is way less than a spray, so why did they put it in a spray?).



    However, if they made it a 3:2 ratio or a 2:1 ratio of none:secrets for the .015 none scenarios, than guys

    who prefer to wear less - ie .005 none - may not get the minimum amount of the secret ingredients Lacroy felt was

    necessary to keep the aggression signal of none in check.

    Many forum members (many who wear .015) have taken

    to using another none source that is pure in combination with Lacroy products because they do not like the 1:1

    ratio.

    The above theory is the only case that I can think of where both parties are on legitimate ground for

    believing in their ratio.


  26. #26
    Bodhi Satva CptKipling's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,142
    Rep Power
    8529

    Default Re: The super sexual :o (but still friendly) mix

    </font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    </font><blockquote><font

    class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
    WAGG is very hard to use in a complex mix

    <hr /></blockquote><font

    class=\"post\">

    Im not sure what you meant by this, but I guess at either

    A) your suggesting its best

    applied separately
    B) or your like me and dont like the wagg+nol combo?

    I did try the wkm version with wagg

    minus the SoE mixed up and I wasnt to happy with the results

    I really like wagg, but I cant have it applied

    anywhere within direct breathing range, and when its all mixed up you almost have to hit the pulse points in

    neck/chin area

    <hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">

    Both, actually.

    I have decided that it is

    often better to mix all of your aggressive products (NPA, PI, other -none products) separately from your

    friendly/comforting products (WAGG, SPMO[mainly because of scent clashes], SOE[sometimes], V-5[sometimes], AE[very

    occasionally, usually with SOE]). This is probably be because you wouldn\'t find them in the same places in

    nature.

    Aggressive products go best in/on: pits, crotch, chest, below ears/jawline/chin, hair etc.



    Friendly/comforting products go best: Between wrists, neck, jaw, nape of neck etc.

    I also get the feeling

    that WAGG doesn\'t get much of a \"voice\" in more complex mixes. My opinion, best dabbed on or in simple mixes

    with -none products.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. HERE IT IS!!! 12 LONG PAGES OF HITS...OR LIES?
    By MOBLEYC57 in forum Pheromone Discussion
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 11-16-2007, 05:43 PM
  2. Effect of mones on sexual performance?
    By caz in forum Pheromone Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-18-2003, 04:43 AM
  3. Orgasm Wars
    By nonscents in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-13-2003, 01:15 PM
  4. What Is The Definition Of Social vs Sexual Hit ??
    By KeepItReal in forum Pheromone Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-10-2003, 09:48 PM
  5. article: nasal spray arouses women
    By **DONOTDELETE** in forum Pheromone Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-07-2002, 07:24 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •