Higher Rone to None

[bjf]

A board member with a

lot of knowledge has been telling me about experimenting with a 2-to-1 Rone to None ratio, and is getting excellent

results.

I would think those on this forum can only do more rone to none if they have CS Rone. Therefore, it is

not liklely many have tried it, but I was thinking perhaps it could be a very beneficial technique in mixes. Has

anyone tried significantly higher Rone to None, and less Nol than none?

How did it work out? For those of you

with CS Rone, perhaps you can try this out...

[Sagacious1420]

Yes Chem

Set Vets, inquiring minds want to know. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[DrSmellThis]

I\'ll keep

my mouth shut until others comment, I\'ve commented on -rone so much.

[cuddlebear]

Actually, I

think we\'d benefit more if you DIDN\'T keep your mouth shut, DST!

[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

But I\'ll put in my 2 cents ... I do have CS Rone, and I

find it very useful, but it seems like I get my best results when I:

a) Use Rone on a separate location from the

other mones.

b) Use Rone sparingly .. I seem to get to \"too much\" rather easily ...

c) I have yet to get

a really good result from using a mix with a High Rone to Nol ratio ... the two work together, but I have always

done better with the Rone level lower. Maybe this is why SOE is 4:1 Nol/Rone.

I have both CS Nol & Rone,

but use a PI-like product for my None.

Cuddles

[DrSmellThis]

I\'d try

that if you were having trouble with -none, maybe. But -rone can lead to very positive reactions, minus the sexual

part, when used alone! And you do need very little of it. Too much takes away from the sexual reactions, but a

little can help them.

Still, anyone inclined to experiment should, in my book.

[Sagacious1420]

Anyone

else have input?