</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
Everyone\'s getting a
Penn State psychology minor from reading all of my posts...only you didn\'t pay $7K/semester to go to these
classes... [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
From the Matching Hypothesis
Thread:
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font
class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
does it die
if i don\'t wear the pheromones? that\'s hard to say. i think pheromones can also cause a sort of bonding that
wouldn\'t just melt away when you stop using them. but i think this is highly dependant on the type of product one
is using. more sexual products like npa/te tend in my opinion to create relationships that will die if you don\'t
use the pheros anymore. on the other hand, wagg is much more bonding, and i think it creates a lasting bonding that
wouldn\'t die (at least not so fast) if you stop using it.
i use different products on purpose with different
women according to what sort of relationship i am looking for. if i just want something quick and sexual that
wouldn\'t last long, i would mostly use te. if i want something longer and deeper with feelings, i would use
something which is less heavy on none and has a considerable amount of nol, something like attraction maybe, and
then also wagg.
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
Why can\'t you use both, ie a lot of nol and
te, for sexual and bonding? Do you find that amounts are unimportant, but rather ratios between the sexual and
bonding pheromones make the difference?
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
well if i want the sexual
relationship, i might also use some nol to make things more relaxed. but if i want something lasting, i would not
use te/npa even not with a lot of nol. at least not at the begining when the relationships is in creation. when i
wear te/npa (even with other products) i feel that takes out the wild side in the woman and make almost all other
sides disappear. i feel that she herself wants me just for the sex. this is something on which one cannot build a
lasting relationship. a few months max. then you have to have other things in the relationship which i feel are lost
with te/npa. but this is just my experience, it could be different for others.
markus
<hr
/></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
This is an interesting argument. Why? Because it touches on
Sternberg\'s Triangular Model:
(Note: sorry if this looks funny, but it\'s the only way I could get it to
keep the shape of a friggin\' triangle...
[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img])
|___________________Intimacy
|______________________/\\
|_
____________________/-- \\
|_____________Passion_/____\\ Commitment
The model shows three aspects to love:
Intimacy, Passion, and Commitment.
Nonlove: Casual Interactions
Intimacy only = Liking; Friendships
Passion
only = Infatuation; \"Love at first sight\", sexual attraction
Commitment only = Empty Love; \"Staying together
for the kids\"
Intimacy + Passion = Romantic Love; Summer fling
Intimacy + Commitment = Companionate Love;
Passionless Marriage, Older couples, Lifetime companionship
Passion + Commitment = Fatuous Love; \"Whirlwind
Courtship\" (best recent example: Bennifer: Passion and engagement to be married, but too much media-frenzy to get
close)
Intimacy + Passion + Commitment = Consumate Love; Complete Love, Most difficult to attain
Now, I think
most people would argue that pheromones in this model would be a passion jumpstart (much like myself
[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]) in this example. This allows for the sexual chemistry/attraction
to skyrocket between people. Now, I believe the above argument would say that sexual -mones such as TE would be
more likely to crank up the passion and allow for some major sexual hits... However, when they wear off, it is
likely that the passion may dissipate, which would lead to nothing being there to keep the flame burning. On the
other hand, using WAGG may allow for an intimacy overhaul where the closeness between the two people can be
increased as well as any passion that may be there. Therefore, if the passion fades slightly from the removal of
-mones from the pictures, you will still have that intimacy that you developed before, thus leading to a better
chance at a solid relationship. I believe that is what the argument above was trying to say using the terms of this
model.
One may also argue that TE or similar products will increase the passion, and with your charm, wit, and
intelligence can allow you to develop the intimacy, etc. needed to build a serious relationship. However, the
previous argument would say that this is harder due to the fact that you don\'t have any assistance of
\"intimacy\" -mones.
Question: How do you feel one can use knowledge of the Triangular Model to your advantage?
Do you think you can attempt to \"jumpstart\" a relationship by combining -mones and your clever wit to develop a
better relationship with an attractive man/woman?
Does this help anyone use their -mones more effectively, or am
I just wasting my time?
I hope this brings some more help to people regarding -mone use...
[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]Pancho [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
Cool post, sweetie! I have two degrees in theis [censored], and
didn\'t know about Sternberg.
And, I thought you were nothing more than a pretty face! <g>
Bookmarks