.. and, if she looks, then looks away.. then looks BACK when she thinks you won\'t notice... you have
her attention.
Or, you may have spinach on your teeth. <G>
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font
class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
If she looks at you for 15 seconds like she wants to kill you, maybe she\'s
had a few too many and you look like her ex-bf, the lousy cheating bastard!
<hr /></blockquote><font
class=\"post\">
Hahaha! Okay, this is all fascinating to me. Is this a proven behavior? Eye contact (maybe a
smile) and then looking down and away? So rolling of the eyes and mouthing \"bug off!\" is a definite not a good
sign? ROFL - Just kidding. I mean, some things are clear as day, but for me the BIGGEST hurdle is just getting past
the eye contact to actually approaching the woman. I guess I\'m just sort of shy about walking up to a woman
I\'ve never met and striking up the conversation. That is where I need to work on things. I just want a definite
sign before I take that chance I guess. Sort of embarrassing for a 35 year old man to be shy about approaching
women, eh?
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
NOT embarassing to be shy. Men are more vulnerable to
rejection, than women. All women have to do is... expect approaches, then accept or reject.
.. and, if she looks, then looks away.. then looks BACK when she thinks you won\'t notice... you have
her attention.
Or, you may have spinach on your teeth. <G>
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
All women have to do is... expect
approaches, then accept or reject.
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
And for this, women should
never whine about anything ever again... [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] J/K.
Kari --
Question. I\'ve always thought women were far more vunerable.... which is why I
thought they have trouble making the first move, among other reasons.
I.E. If a single man rejects a woman,
it is more often than not because he isn\'t physically turned on by her. We are a lot less choosy about who and
how many sexual partners to pursue, making a gizzilion sperm a minute as we do.
Women on the other hand, can
be rejecting because of looks, personality (which a man doesn\'t have to take personally when the woman doesn\'t
know him well) or she\'s just not in the right state of mind at the time, etc. Seems to me we have very little at
stake, considering it could be a anyone of a number of personal or inpersonal reasons for the rejection, and we
will never know which one it is.
Women on the other hand can usually figure it out (looks), and I would think
it is difficult to make the first move when you are always knowing what personal thing you are being judged
on.
See what I am saying? Why do you think that men are more vulnerable?
Men are more likely to take rejection personally, the male ego thing ...
Women know if one guy
doesn\'t dig on them, that there are a thousand other horny fish in the sea ...
Never thought that was very
fair myself ...
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
Kari --
Question. I\'ve always
thought women were far more vunerable.... which is why I thought they have trouble making the first move, among
other reasons.
I.E. If a single man rejects a woman, it is more often than not because he isn\'t physically
turned on by her. We are a lot less choosy about who and how many sexual partners to pursue, making a gizzilion
sperm a minute as we do.
Women on the other hand, can be rejecting because of looks, personality (which a man
doesn\'t have to take personally when the woman doesn\'t know him well) or she\'s just not in the right state
of mind at the time, etc. Seems to me we have very little at stake, considering it could be a anyone of a number
of personal or inpersonal reasons for the rejection, and we will never know which one it is.
Women on the other
hand can usually figure it out (looks), and I would think it is difficult to make the first move when you are always
knowing what personal thing you are being judged on.
See what I am saying? Why do you think that men are more
vulnerable?
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
I\'m not sure that women have difficulty
making the first DIRECT move, as much as many of us prefer to be approached, so that we can appear to do the
selecting. I say \"appear,\" because we have often managed to make the first indirect move-- subtly indicating
interest through looks, banter, innuendo, or body language. If the man doesn\'t pick up on the signals, we assume
he isn\'t interested. Because the move was indirect, the lady hasn\'t risked her ego.
Most women can quickly
assess which men are likely to be receptive (it\'s in the eyes), and can limit their \"signals\" to those.
Also, because men are less choosy, thanks to testosterone, women get approached a lot. So, it\'s easy to sit
back and choose. The lady doesn\'t have to make the first direct move, unless she chooses to be the aggressor
(which can also be fun). <g>
I think some men are more sensitive than they appear to be, and can be
momentarily a little bruised by a rejection-- or a few rejections-- even if there is no emotional involvement. I
think some men may not consider all the factors involved in eliciting a womans interest (as you have), and may think
that her rejection reflects solely on his lack of attractiveness. In short-- I think that some men expect women to
think like they do.
A woman gets valdiation of her attractiveness just from the approaches, even if the man
doesn\'t interest her.
There are, of course, guys like the late TV actor, Hugh O\'Brian. He used to walk up
to women and say, \"I\'m Hugh O\'Brian, wanna f**K?\" He might get rejected 50 time, he used to say, But,
he\'d ask 51 times. So, he always got laid. <g>
I hope I\'ve explained myself clearly. If I haven\'t
please let me know-- it\'s been a rough day.
Thanks! K.
I am sorry if it a rough day.
I think I understand what you are saying. I thought you meant men
are more vunerable making the first move than women. From what I read, you seem to be saying men are more vunerable
in the scene because they have to do the soliciting, women do the choosing (which is a position of power as opposed
to vunerability).
You are definitely right, some men have there egos bruised because they don\'t realize how
the process is different for women than men.
And I love the indirect signals. Send me a sign! Too bad so many
women tend to be shy and don\'t use them! Plus maybe they don\'t want to send signinals to guys who miht turn
out to be pigs. Maybe the pigs ruin it for us all.
I am sorry if it a rough day.
-- Thanks! The gym, after work, will smooth it out.
I think I
understand what you are saying. I thought you meant men are more vunerable making the first move than women. From
what I read, you seem to be saying men are more vunerable in the scene because they have to do the soliciting, women
do the choosing (which is a position of power as opposed to vunerability).
-- Exactly! Men have to put their egos
on the line. Women just have to signal, then wait and see whether he bites.
You are definitely right, some men
have there egos bruised because they don\'t realize how the process is different for women than men.
-- You
have a rare understanding of the process. I hate to see a guy get a little bruised, because he doesn\'t understand
that womens\' criteria are more complicated-- or at least, different.
And I love the indirect signals. Send
me a sign! Too bad so many women tend to be shy and don\'t use them! Plus maybe they don\'t want to send
signinals to guys who miht turn out to be pigs. Maybe the pigs ruin it for us all.
-- I think you\'re right.
Many ladies find it scary. Though, it needn\'t be. If he turns out to be a pig, she can beat a retreat.
-- Re:
signals: there was a TV movie called \"Sex and Mrs. X\" starring Jackie Bissett. In one scene, she demonstrated
casting a subtle, but alluring look over the rim of her wine glass.
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
Men are more likely to take rejection
personally, the male ego thing ...
Women know if one guy doesn\'t dig on them, that there are a thousand other
horny fish in the sea ...
Never thought that was very fair myself ...
<hr /></blockquote><font
class=\"post\">
If you read all of the holy books, of all of the religions, you will never find the word
\"fair\" in any of them. <g>
In mammals including primates (which we are), and in numerous direct studies of human courtship, the
basic pattern is the same. There are exchanged signals of gender and recognition. Next the female sends an overt
signal of some kind (‘proceptive behavior’), which incites the male to ‘approach’. Then the female exhibits
‘receptive behavior’ to his advance. The next generation is ensured…
Aside from the scientific lingo, it’s
all pretty simple when it plays out. We are basically unaware of all this signaling at the time (unless we’ve
studied it and concentrate), and the signals are processed unconsciously. The biggest detriment to a smooth
courtship is neurotic focus on ourselves and our own fragile egos – our big forebrain gets in the way and we stumble
over it on the way to our dreamgirl. The remedy is to put on your best ‘gameface’ in advance (grooming, clothes,
pheros, etc.) and then forget about that and yourself. Focus on the girl, instead of how you are coming across –
she’ll sense and appreciate that attention.
I like to keep things simple. Catch a girl’s glance a few times,
smile a little, see how she responds. If it is at all positive just walk up introduce yourself and start a casual
conversation. Any topic is fine - especially commenting on what\'s going on around you. The idea is that now you
are talking - not that you are a brilliant conversationalist. If it doesn’t click after a few minutes or she seems
annoyed just smile and beg off with a “Nice talking to ya!”, and move on. Anyone can engage in a simple casual
conversation with no danger to their ego. If the conversation starts to develop into something more - great! If not,
no harm done.
Hell sometimes we act like we’re trying to communicate with an alien species…they’re just women
after all. They’re programmed to respond to men just like men are programmed to chase them. Just follow the basic
pattern and try not to overthink the proceedings. Focus outwardly instead of inwardly.
Being able to
recognize positive encouraging signals will help you avoid rejection when you approach - you\'ll have an idea if
she wants you to approach , and you can pass her by if she\'s signaling dislike. But even if you get it wrong
you\'re not going to die, and most of the time you can exit gracefully from a rejection if you have decent
manners.
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
In mammals including primates (which we
are), and in numerous direct studies of human courtship, the basic pattern is the same. There are exchanged signals
of gender and recognition. Next the female sends an overt signal of some kind (‘proceptive behavior’), which incites
the male to ‘approach’. Then the female exhibits ‘receptive behavior’ to his advance. The next generation is
ensured…
Aside from the scientific lingo, it’s all pretty simple when it plays out. We are basically unaware of
all this signaling at the time (unless we’ve studied it and concentrate), and the signals are processed
unconsciously. The biggest detriment to a smooth courtship is neurotic focus on ourselves and our own fragile egos –
our big forebrain gets in the way and we stumble over it on the way to our dreamgirl. The remedy is to put on your
best ‘gameface’ in advance (grooming, clothes, pheros, etc.) and then forget about that and yourself. Focus on the
girl, instead of how you are coming across – she’ll sense and appreciate that attention.
I like to keep things
simple. Catch a girl’s glance a few times, smile a little, see how she responds. If it is at all positive just walk
up introduce yourself and start a casual conversation. Any topic is fine - especially commenting on what\'s going
on around you. The idea is that now you are talking - not that you are a brilliant conversationalist. If it doesn’t
click after a few minutes or she seems annoyed just smile and beg off with a “Nice talking to ya!”, and move on.
Anyone can engage in a simple casual conversation with no danger to their ego. If the conversation starts to develop
into something more - great! If not, no harm done.
Hell sometimes we act like we’re trying to communicate with an
alien species…they’re just women after all. They’re programmed to respond to men just like men are programmed to
chase them. Just follow the basic pattern and try not to overthink the proceedings. Focus outwardly instead of
inwardly.
Being able to recognize positive encouraging signals will help you avoid rejection when you approach -
you\'ll have an idea if she wants you to approach , and you can pass her by if she\'s signaling dislike. But
even if you get it wrong you\'re not going to die, and most of the time you can exit gracefully from a rejection
if you have decent manners.
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
The first paragraph shows that we
really haven\'t been out of the tress, all that long. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Very insightful posts Kari & Irish. Most men do not look for or pick up on the right cues. Even if
they do many will fail to act on them anyway. The lines also fail once a followup is initiated. Especially in a bar
scenario where people tend to not act as themselves and are out to deviously impress.
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
Very insightful posts Kari & Irish.
Most men do not look for or pick up on the right cues. Even if they do many will fail to act on them anyway. The
lines also fail once a followup is initiated. Especially in a bar scenario where people tend to not act as
themselves and are out to deviously impress.
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
But.. a man who
DOES pick up on the cues... especially the less obvious ones.... can get VERY lucky!
Kari-Have you ever been affected by another\'s mones and in waht way did you react?
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
Kari-Have you ever been affected by
another\'s mones and in waht way did you react?
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
I think so. I
have a friend who doesn\'t wear mones. But, he REALLY puts out the sexual vibes. It\'s almost palpable. I think
he generates a lot of natural mones. He isn\'t that good looking. He also isn\'t my type. We have nothing in
common. But, I often want to nibble his neck, and I hug him a lot. He\'s involved, so I can\'t flirt \"with
intent.\" But, I notice that women turn to look at him, on the street.
He only affects me, if I am in fairly
close proximity.
Johnny writes:
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
But I\'d like to
get some advice on how to go from a smile from across the room to approaching the person and striking up a
conversation. Am I worrying too much about it? Should I just walk up and say, &#8220;Hi!\"? Hehe... What gives
you the clue that a woman is attracted, if even only slightly, to you from across the room?
<hr
/></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
An initial very short eye contact, followed by repeated short eye contact.
Find an excuse to walk by \"target\" and eye contact with a small but sincere smile. Followed up with a very
short, but meaningful positive comment (\"those are the sexiest boots I\'ve ever seen\"), which will let you
know if you can go on from there.
Crap, who knows what really works. I had a girl start making out with me and
go down the front of my pants because I grabbed her and took her along when I was making a surge to the front row of
the stage at a Poison/Ratt concert. (BTW - we were making out in the front row during the concert.) (And no,
I\'m not going to explain what I was doing at a Poison/Ratt concert in the first place. Screw you - they were
cool in the late eighties.)
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
Sort of
embarrassing for a 35 year old man to be shy about approaching women, eh?
<hr /></blockquote><font
class=\"post\">
Not really. You\'re still the same person you were 15 years ago, and you were probably shy
then. I\'m shy. Seriously. If it wasn\'t for girls asking me out from 14 to 24, I probably wouldn\'t have
gone out at all. However, I\'ve found out that just opening up and initiating the contact and conversation, you
can get a lot more accomplished than hoping and waiting for somebody else to do it instead. Life is short, and
being reserved and hoping that somebody else makes the first move makes it all that much shorter.
Besides -
what\'s the worst that could happen? She says no? Well then, you are still at the same place that you were if
you did nothing at all. And, perhaps, just maybe, if you actually initiate the contact/conversation, etc., you
might actually find that things work out for the best.
You\'ll never know unless you try.
Kari writes:
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
If the man doesn\'t
pick up on the signals, we assume he isn\'t interested.
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
Wrong!
Assume the man is drunk or stupid or oblivious, but don\'t assume that he isn\'t interested. Every guy (at
least every guy I know, including myself) likes to be hit on by women, and subtle doesn\'t usually get it with us.
Most of us require the frying pan to the head to get that information in. (Don\'t think that \"Can I buy you a
drink?\" is a strong approach - most guys will just think \"Sweet! A free drink! I wonder why she bought me a
drink. I only wish that I had the balls to talk to her.\")
All guys are interested, especially if the woman is
even remotely attractive. Married guys. Single guys. Partially dead guys. We\'re just stupid, and don\'t
want to offend you, or are scared of rejection or whatever. We\'re still interested. Hell, every time I walk out
the door I\'m saddened that I don\'t get hit on, and then wonder why every woman is so unaccessible. Frigid
bunch of uptight bitches! Why can\'t I get laid? C\'MON! And then we just can\'t believe that the girl we
had our eyes on all night ends up going home with some heavy browed neanderthal. I can\'t believe that she went
home with that ape when I could have loved her forever with all my heart. (Sure, we were too chicken to even go up
to her or look at her all night, but goddamn if we weren\'t interested. Not interested?! I\'d have given my
left nut to have been with her tonight!)
That\'s most guys in a nutshell. With the exception of the dopey
meatheads who are either too stupid to ponder and deal with the possible subconcious complications subsequent to the
rejection, or have nothing to lose as they have already figured out from numerous rejections that life goes on, so
they might as well take a shot at the hot chick.
However, once a normal guy does initiate conversation with the
\"hot chick\", watch how many of the chicken sh_t mediocrity then go diving in in an attempt at contact. (It\'s
like baseball. A pitcher is just throwing bb\'s and nobody can touch him, then your 8th position guy rocks a
double and then everybody thinks that they can hit the guy. Girls and like a curveball. Nobody thinks that they
can hit it, but as soon as somebody does, everybody wants to, and thinks that they can, hit that stuff.)
I second this post. An uninterested male? Not likely ...
goood post!
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
An uninterested male? Not likely ...
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
I don\'t mean to offend any of the guys posting, but...you
know, I see you guys saying all this, and then I think back to all the posts where I see guys complain about fat or
ugly women hitting on them, and wanting to know how they can get them to stop.
Just an observation.
Yeah, and women complain about ugly, uninteresting guys or jerks hitting on them all of the time when
all they really want is a \'nice guy\'... Go figure.
I still say we need a definite system to get the
go-ahead to flirt with someone. Something like the \'hotornot\' system where you both click \'yes\' if
you\'re interested and then attempt conversation. If I were a TV network, I\'d start a show where they made
definite verbal signals on whether a guy/girl was interested. For instance, if you were interested, you\'d say
\"Hi,\" but if you weren\'t you\'d say, \"Hey, there.\" That way you could let someone know where you stand
without saying anything out of the ordinary. This, of course, would never work, but it\'s nice to dream. This
goes along the lines of my \'ring\' idea where if you\'re married you have the ring on the left ring finger,
if you have a bf or are interested in someone you put a ring on your right ring finger, and if you want some action
you have no rings. That way no one looking for action will bother flirting with you if you have the ring. Great
system, absolutely no relation to what\'s really possible and no capability of instituting it globally.
[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] A man can dream, dammit!!!
[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
I don\'t mean to offend any of
the guys posting, but...you know, I see you guys saying all this, and then I think back to all the posts where I see
guys complain about fat or ugly women hitting on them, and wanting to know how they can get them to stop.
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
A very good point.
This fence is rather uncomfortable.
I think those kinds of posts stick out like a sore thumb, but usually us guys have our thumbs, and
heads, stuck safely up our asses. You have to know how to give a clear signal. This is a fundamental skill of
womanhood, in my O. On the other hand, our job is to learn to recognize clear signals. This is where evolution comes
in.
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
So down and away simultaneously is
the key? Worth a try ... I will watch for that in the future. I\'m so glad we have females here
<hr
/></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
Also works when urinating.
[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
There are, of course, guys like the
late TV actor, Hugh O\'Brian. He used to walk up to women and say, \"I\'m Hugh O\'Brian, wanna f**K?\" He
might get rejected 50 time, he used to say, But, he\'d ask 51 times. So, he always got laid. <g>
<hr
/></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
I used to do that, but it never worked. Eventually they all found out my
name isn\'t Hugh O\'Brian.
Sexy writes:
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
I don\'t mean to
offend any of the guys posting, but...you know, I see you guys saying all this, and then I think back to all the
posts where I see guys complain about fat or ugly women hitting on them, and wanting to know how they can get them
to stop.
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
Not this guy. Crap, I\'ll take any attention that I
can get. Yeah, I might be a borderline egomaniac (and as I get older I know that compliments are going to be harder
to find regardless if they come from hotties or fatties), but letting fat ugly chicks hit on me once got me a good
friend that resulted in a couple years in a luxury box at the KC Chiefs games and horse riding whenever I wanted to
saddle up.
(By the way, fat and ugly is all in the eyes of the beholder. I mean, Kari said Brad Pitt wasn\'t
sexy. I mean, really. Brad Pitt not sexy? Have you seen that guys bod? That\'s a 40 year old bod BTW. Sexy as
hell. I\'d consider having sex with him he\'s so sexy (although I\'d have the ground rule that I would not be
the recipient, if you know what I mean. A hot chick with a strap on is one thing, a guy is completely different.
(Speaking from a hetero point of view.) Some people might prefer plump to a rock hard sexy, supple, volumptuous,
passionate, exotic, flexible body.)
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
Also, there\'s such a thing as
ugly-sexy. Bogart, Tommy Lee Jones, Tom Berenger. Then there are guys like Tom Sellick and Brad Pitt who are
classically attractive, but don\'t have much sex appeal. In guys, looks don\'t often have a lot to do with sex
appeal. It\'s presence that matters.
--------------------
\"Sex appeal is 50% what you have and 50% what
people think you have.\"-- Sophia Loren
Post Extras:
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
and, if she looks, then looks away.. then looks
BACK when she thinks you won\'t notice... you have her attention.
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
the way, fat and ugly is all in the eyes of
the beholder. I mean, Kari said Brad Pitt wasn\'t sexy. I mean, really. Brad Pitt not sexy? Have you seen that
guys bod? That\'s a 40 year old bod BTW. Sexy as hell. I\'d consider having sex with him he\'s so sexy
(although I\'d have the ground rule that I would not be the recipient, if you know what I mean. A hot chick with a
strap on is one thing, a guy is completely different. (Speaking from a hetero point of view.) Some people might
prefer plump to a rock hard sexy, supple, volumptuous, passionate, exotic, flexible body.)
<hr
/></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
that\'s why i say thta u must at least have that x factor because u
can catch someone eye. if u are not attractive in away or another physically, u would unlikely hold her eye
contact! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
Yeah, and women complain about ugly,
uninteresting guys or jerks hitting on them all of the time when all they really want is a \'nice guy\'... Go
figure.
I still say we need a definite system to get the go-ahead to flirt with someone. Something like the
\'hotornot\' system where you both click \'yes\' if you\'re interested and then attempt conversation. If
I were a TV network, I\'d start a show where they made definite verbal signals on whether a guy/girl was
interested. For instance, if you were interested, you\'d say \"Hi,\" but if you weren\'t you\'d say,
\"Hey, there.\" That way you could let someone know where you stand without saying anything out of the ordinary.
This, of course, would never work, but it\'s nice to dream. This goes along the lines of my \'ring\' idea
where if you\'re married you have the ring on the left ring finger, if you have a bf or are interested in someone
you put a ring on your right ring finger, and if you want some action you have no rings. That way no one looking
for action will bother flirting with you if you have the ring. Great system, absolutely no relation to what\'s
really possible and no capability of instituting it globally. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] A
man can dream, dammit!!! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
Speaking of
signals... there\'s a course for women called the \"Art of Exotic Dancing\"-- taught by an ex-stripper. One of
the primary lessons is how to enter a room, and use eye contact to create a presence. The class is on vid, and also
tours the country. Being an ex-dancer, I fond it to be of value.
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
Sexy writes:
</font><blockquote><font
class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
I don\'t mean to offend any of the guys posting, but...you know, I see you
guys saying all this, and then I think back to all the posts where I see guys complain about fat or ugly women
hitting on them, and wanting to know how they can get them to stop.
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
Not this guy. Crap, I\'ll take any attention that I can get. Yeah, I might be a borderline egomaniac (and as
I get older I know that compliments are going to be harder to find regardless if they come from hotties or fatties),
but letting fat ugly chicks hit on me once got me a good friend that resulted in a couple years in a luxury box at
the KC Chiefs games and horse riding whenever I wanted to saddle up.
<hr /></blockquote><font
class=\"post\">
I agree with Sacogoo\'s attitude. I haven\'t had a fat or ugly woman hitting on me with
mones on yet. I see the potential for this to be a problem; but, you can always control how far an interaction goes
with anybody. You could end up with unexpected perks (like a luxury box). If someone hits on you that you don\'t
find attractive at all, you can be polite, but don\'t have to go home with them, or even spend much time with
them. If it were me, I would just record it as a hit, and move on to another person.
Now listening to: \"Kid
Charlemaign\" by Steely Dan. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
AzMike
</font><blockquote><font class=\"small\">Quote:</font><hr />
All guys are interested, especially if
the woman is even remotely attractive. Married guys. Single guys. Partially dead guys. We\'re just stupid, and
don\'t want to offend you, or are scared of rejection or whatever. We\'re still interested. Hell, every time I
walk out the door I\'m saddened that I don\'t get hit on, and then wonder why every woman is so unaccessible.
Frigid bunch of uptight bitches! Why can\'t I get laid? C\'MON! And then we just can\'t believe that the
girl we had our eyes on all night ends up going home with some heavy browed neanderthal. I can\'t believe that
she went home with that ape when I could have loved her forever with all my heart. (Sure, we were too chicken to
even go up to her or look at her all night, but goddamn if we weren\'t interested. Not interested?! I\'d have
given my left nut to have been with her tonight!)
<hr /></blockquote><font class=\"post\">
The majority of
women prefer a heavy browed neanderthal to an intelligent guy. Brawn usually wins out over brains, when women judge
guys. If you are built like a big ape, you will be quite popular with women, pheromones or no pheromones.
Now
listening to: \"Eagles Fly\" by Sammy Hagar.
AzMike
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks