NONE or NOL

[SLK]

Hi,

Newbies wondering which

route to take, I have this simple equation for you.

If you\'re on the attractive side, then NOL would help you

more than NONE. On the other hand, NONE would be a much better choice than NOL if you happen to be on the less

attractive side.

I\'ve inferred this from my 3 month experiment with NONE and NOL based products.

For

instance, I am considered good-looking and my results with NOL were considerably better than with NONE. However, my

friends whom are average looking, fared a lot better with NONE.

Cheers
SLK

[Brian]

I\'m not so sure that

looks have much to do with it. I tend to think it\'s more the phero users own body chemistry, than anything.

[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Brian

[belgareth]

Another thing to add to

the equation, possibly more important, is your personal pheromone signature. Are you a high none producer already?

If so, increasing the none might push you into the Clint Eastwood zone. Adding nol to your signature may make you

more approachable. Also consider body types. A big guy with a high none signature would be more intimidating (and

believeable?) than a little guy with the same signature.

[CptKipling]

...and your

personality.