Exposure to synthetic copulins
boosts testosterone for men (Jutte). So it's unlikely they don't affect attraction and libido.
My suspicion is, and I
welcome any evidence to the contrary, that synthetic copulins aren't likely to be very effective.
I wonder,
however, if a substance that could cause women to increase production of their own natural copulins wouldn't be
very effective. I think increasing one's natural copulins is probably more likely to be successful in sexually
affecting/attracting human males.
Since androstenol is likely to affect luteinizing hormone, which may in turn
increase estrogen levels (which are higher in younger women as compared with older women), will increased estrogen
cause increased copulin production?
I wonder about this, since estrogen is related to fertility and since it is
assumed that copulin production has a relationship fertility by attracting a mate at ovulation time (copulins are
highest at ovulation).
Will DHEA have any affect on luteinizing hormone, estrogen or copulins??
I think
there's potential benefit in figuring out the precursors to natural copulin production.
Exposure to synthetic copulins
boosts testosterone for men (Jutte). So it's unlikely they don't affect attraction and libido.
DrSmellThis (creator of P H E R O S)
If the molecules are the same,
the body has no way of telling if they were made in a laboratory, a human body or an alien spaceship. Reactions
would be the same.
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson
http://pherolibrary.com/reference/phero-
links.htm
That page should
provide some links to copulin information.
That's the problem, of course - the molecules are never the same. NaturalOriginally Posted by belgareth
ingredients generally consist of hundreds of somewhat related chemicals, of which we isolate a dozen or so and call
them "pheromones", or "copulins". There's no telling what else is in there that we haven't been able to name
yet.
-Bass
somewhere between amused and obsessed...
Originally Posted by BassMan
I agree. Would not real
human copulins have the person's DNA signature in them?
I would guess no, but I know
what you are getting at. Natural copulins would be a lot more "personal" and specific.
Identified molecules would be theOriginally Posted by BassMan
same, same as none or nol or any of the others. You would not be able to tell them apart. You are right that there
are still a bunch of different chemicals that are not identified. That does not mean the duplicated synthetic
copulins would not have an effect. Your body would not be able to tell them from naturally occuring ones.
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks