It's not psychological

[**DONOTDELETE**]

I am a newbie and a bit of a sceptic (was)... First time I tried the newbie starter kit from love-scent, I was amazed. Actually, I totally forgot I had put on a spray of Eros. After the 3rd woman flirted big time, I remembered that I had tried one little squirt. I looked back at it and realized that these 3 women were seriously connecting to me - not just casual conversation. I was \"out in public\" so this wasn\'t a pick-up patrol, but it was serious attraction above and beyond my normal playful intercourses :-)

[franki]

You used the Edge, right?

[**DONOTDELETE**]

Yes - that\'s it the Pro Edge mini-squirter...

[franki]

The Edge is very good stuff for getting attention. [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

Any new results with Pro Edge or with SOE yesman? I would be happy to read your first experience wasn\'t a fluke.

Franki [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

[**DONOTDELETE**]

I did have another \"success\" - of a different version. I\'ll post at the top level. The Edge seems to help flirting attraction in public. When I am thinking about having the scent on, it\'s fun trying to get the women to be able to smell it (I guess I shouldn\'t put it on my elbows :-) There\'s an attractive component to simply getting close, a brush by or a whisper offers the closeness to get a good whiff and implies more.

[Watcher]

Amazing what happens when you have a biological pull over women, i mean straight into thier hypothamus unconscious part of their brain.

[Gerund]

I have very unpredictable results with The Edge:

..... 8 out of 10 women don\'t seem to notice it at all;
..... 1 in 10 women actually seem repulsed by it;
..... 1 in 10 women will exhibit a blatant sexual hit.

Maybe I just have to iron out how much to use and where to apply it?

[DrSmellThis]

good issue to bring up...

Does anyone feel they have a reliable answer to part of this?

What are better and worse ways to use Edge?

[Wolfe]

the best answer is to use Pi/m [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

[dpguy]

Does the Edge supposedly get more sexual hits than Pi/m? (I realize that they are both -none products). If this is true, is it the same for NPA also?

Dpguy

[Wolfe]

this my 1st experiance using edge and am sure it\'s bout my last too. i\'ve had much better results using AE. I\'ve read as many posts on edge as i could so far and it seems to be pretty much a hit and miss -none for some reason. now this is purely MHO and i\'m sure some would tell you it\'s THE thing for them, and ya know what..might be(personal chemistry always plays a part). <---not to mention your own personal feelings you get from using it(this mental edge plays a hugh role in any thing you do- you think you are, hence you are).

[Watcher]

A bit more extreme with the results than AE but if you use less perhaps or dilute it.

AE 5 in 10 get repulsed.
3 in 10 have negible returns
2 in 10 will respond to it.

That is my general feedback with alter ego.

[DrSmellThis]

I try to keep myself to 10 dabs of Edge or less, but I like to use a lot. I like to maximize what I can get away with. I don\'t spray it -- too imprecise.

[Whitehall]

\"..... 1 in 10 women will exhibit a blatant sexual hit. \"

The plan, then is contact 20 women and find yourself a threesome.

Seriously, finding a sexual partner has serious statistical problems. You may remember our thread on one in seven as prime targets.

TE is a product that produces serious sexual hits. The variability I think is with the targets and their setting rather than how you apply. Plus your own persona affects the responses more than you think.

[Gerund]

So, to recap: (.1) x [(2) x (10)] = threesome?

Boy, this new math can be tough... [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/wink.gif[/img]

[Whitehall]

Don\'t forget yourself!

1 + 2 X (.1 X 10) = Threesome

[Gerund]

I know that you silly goose! Okay, Okay, so I was just going for the easy one-liner in my post. Jeez, and you gotta go & get all literal on me! [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

So to move on: if four (4) participants are involved, would it be necessary to consider subsets? Would a factorial apply? [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/wink.gif[/img]

[Whitehall]

Tell you what, you sit down with your calculator or spreadsheet and figure it out for us.

We\'ll be chasing the women.

[Watcher]

What about removing quick contacts and females in relationships into the mathematical equation.

[xvs]

Some studies have shown that women who are ovulating have a more positive reaction to androstenone.

Since the fertile period lasts about 4 days per month, about 1 out of 9 women you meet are likely to be ovulating at any given time. This corresponds roughly to what you\'re seeing.

[franki]

That is really the big downside of the \"heavy none approach\" IMO. You always kind of have to figure out which girl is receptive and which is not. It is a hit or miss thing with -none. But, when you hit, you are in for a treat. [img]/ubbthreads/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

Franki

[Gerund]

Hey, I\'d forgotten about that. Thanks for the reminder about the ovulation/androstenone connection!