Why is it that -RONE has the lowest concentration?
Reply With Quote
OK, here goes. Rone is not my area of expertise, but I\'ll try to be helpful. I do have general opinions.
Rone is a patchouli of pheromones -- it is a fixative, and a little goes a long way. It\'s like spice to food -- you want it, but not as the whole taste.
It depends on your purposes. If you want to establish yourself as dominant, masculine,and territorial, more rone would be good. If you want to attract women mainly, the other ones are more primary. -Rone tends to be a bit repulsive to the male wearer. It has an edgy, funky, old urine smell, especially after it wears, and lingers long after other mones fade. It tends to enhance the other mones, and not much is required for this particular effect (at least .015 mg/ml and at least a 1:10 ratio to all the other mones combined). It tends to be less effective by itself for our purposes. Unlike -none, -rone supposedly smells better to women than to men. Personally, I sometimes find it to have a pleasant musky male odor, and sometimes I think it smells pretty bad, especially after it wears.
Having said that, rone is used up to 1:3.5 compared to -nol + -none.
I like it for making women submissive. Last night a woman asked permission to leave my apartment while I was wearing a fairly substantive -rone mix.
Somebody correct me if I\'m wrong.
Line the VNO-effect craze that led to A1\'s popularity, I think this leutenizing hormone emphasis is good, but a bit of a fetish. There are other effects of importance, and that effect alone is not enough to cause attraction.
Bookmarks