Hello,
We used to sell the stuff at Love Scent and while I wouldn\'t call it \"rubish\" it is clearly the weakest pheromone additive on the market to the point of being roughly 1 light year behind the pack. I don\'t doubt the PI evaluation at all, although I think I did when I first saw it. If you pour a considerable amount of Hi-Oct onto a piece of material and wait the very long time necessary for that witch hazel smell to completely evaporate, you will be able to detect a VERY faint smell of aNONE and while I suppose it is theoretically possible that the amount of aNOL (which you can\'t smell) is picking up the slack, I tend to doubt that, as it would require a NOL level about 10 times the anemic NONE level to get off the ground. I also had severe mixing problems on at least one occassion and found that adding Hi Oct to oily cologne caused globs of precipitant to form and drift to the bottom.
Back when I designed what is now known as the \"old\" Pheromone Additve the idea was to come up with an additive type product that really had some balls. I am just guessing based on smell, but I would say the old PA is roughly 3-5 times stronger than Hi Oct, and although old PA is more closely matched to Hi Oct in formula, the popular New PA has about 5 times the aNONE as does the old PA. If you were to do a comparative sniff test between side by side equal amounts of Hi Oct and NPA I am quite sure you will agree the difference is obvious. If you want to buy something from that company get their Beaches; also skimpy on the pheros I would guess, but smells great. Probably a woman could add some PI/W to that and have herself quite a brew. I used to wear that stuff myself and found the smell very relaxing somehow.
Cheers,
Bruce
Bookmarks