I admit I've only scanned MM, and haven't read The Game, but from what I've heard they are
both essentially the same. The Game was the author's experiences he had while following the principles of MM.
Granted he may have modified the approaches and all to suit himself. What little I remember for MM is that it read
like a scientific technical manual. Too many charts. Felt to "mechanical."
One thing I suggest is to read over
everything you can get, including MM, The Game, DeAngelo's DYD, and even the Mars and Venus book series. They all
represent different approaches. Reading over a variety of opinions will give you a good overview of the whole
subject. Just pick out of each what sounds good to you and give it a try and see how it works. You have to find your
own niche.
Bookmarks