Bruce will take your word for it. The rest of us can only take your word for it.
But
I have noticed through the years that when consumers have no results with a pheromone product, they are too fast to
conclude for sure that the product is defective.
There are countless reasons why results vary, and product
quality from batch to batch would typically be low on the list of what is really going on.
This might not be
applicable in your case, if you compared smells and results among batches for a long period of time. But did you
know that your ability to smell androstenone is not constant? Even people who are fortunate enough to be good at
being able to smell it will demonstrate a varied ability, based on whatever their hormones are doing that day, or
where their hormones are cycling. Lots of other variables effect smell too, especially those smells. If hormonal
smells didn't vary by circumstance, they wouldn't function to do what they do. The whole point of androstenone's
effect is to be smellable as a "stink" during those times when breeding is less than optimum, and less smellable
when breeding is more optimum.
Or say, having a cold can damage smell long after the cold is gone, for example.
This is just the tip of the iceberg.
Having said that,
it is a very good practice to provide negative
feedback as you have,
so Bruce can help us out with his best quality control. Bruce has always made it a
rule to deal with only the most trustworthy manufacturers. But he certainly has eliminated sheisters from time to
time, and sometimes people start off honest but stray. So it's good you're looking into
it.
Bookmarks