hello!
anyone has any info on
A314 LS version??
I recently got A314
version 17 from the other site, its same 10ml bottle but half filled in $69.95 while the one I got in July 2006 from
same site worked very well for me & was filled little below cap in same price, strangely they both claimed to be
10ml
The one I got in July 2006 gave me very good results, its just I didn't like the new version so can any
one tell me LS has same old formulation or they still buying from them & selling up to date version?
I know LS
sell 15ml in same price but I wonder how old is this formula LS selling now? If LS sells older pre 2006 formulation
then I love to buy this
hello!
anyone has any info on
A314 LS version??
I'm no expert, and I'm sorta
guessing, but to the best of my knowledge the L-S version is an "older" version, as opposed to the much tweaked
"newer" versions from you-know-who.
HOWEVER, as many can tell you, a "new improved/tweaked" version is not
necessarily better. The version L-S is using seems to be doing just fine by most who use it (based on what I read on
the forums). The other versions seem to be a combination of pheromone tweaking of various sorts and cover scent
tweaking. The primary ingredient(s) (mostly androsterone) seem to stay pretty much the same.
If the L-S version
works for you then stay with it. Unless the other more expensive versions make a really big difference in responses
why pay more than you have to?
The L-S version has been doing just fine for me personally.
The opposite of love isn't hate.
It's apathy.
I bought the LS version, and
I'm pretty sure it's the "older" one. It definitely works, and I like the herbal smell. My bottle was filled to
the cap.
The "old" A314 is a fine product.
But I also understand why Harris tries to tweak it. However, it gets rather expensive for the average consumer to
try and test all these variations. That is a big draw back. It really takes thorough testing by a wide number of
people to see a consistent pattern.
I have a version more recent
than the one L-S carries, which works fine. But I liked the previous, L-S version a little better for my own uses.
Maybe I'm just imagining the difference, but I can tell you I got great results form the L-S version.
DrSmellThis (creator of P H E R O S)
The older version A314, i obtained from L-S workes very well, when talking pheromone results, But the
carrier oil in it is a cheaper carrier oil than the AD version and therefore the L-S version does cause the skin on
my neck to itch when applied there, so i restrict this L-S version to wrist and arm
applications.
The same month i received my 15 mL, L-S version of A314 i also received another 15 mL version from
AD and the more expensive carrier oil in the AD version did not cause any skin irritation, and it also exibited a
more sweeter and also enduring fragrance.
But i must say that when discussing the pheromone action of the two then both
versions do work very well.
One of my favourite mixes is A314 x 2 dr + Alpha 7 x 1 dr.
Overall A314 what i would say is a good
consistant pheromone product, Even so it took me a good 3 weeks at least for me to notice any real action with this
stuff, But now it is amoungst my favourites.
I also did notice
that PI and APC do also cause soft skin on my neck area to itch as the carrier oils do irritate slightly.
I AM. Out of my mind .... .... ....
Terry: I understand that one of the
changes AD has made (to a314 and others) is to go with an "organic" carrier oil. That could account in part for the
price difference.
Does it really makes a difference in performance? Who knows.
It did seem to help your
skin problem at least.
I really haven't noticed any change between the "old" carriers and the "new," but I also
seem to be less sensitive to many products. And sometimes I think the "organic" thing is more marketing than
anything else (with a variety of products. I'm not saying only with AD.) The same way you hear "natural
ingredients" hyped.
My opinions
The opposite of love isn't hate.
It's apathy.
I often wonder at the "All
Organic" or "All Natural" labels myself. It seems as often as not the product can be just as bad or even worse for
you in some ways. Keep in mind that botulism, cyanide, nicotine and ebola are all natural and organic too.
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson
Chicago area news is hot with a raid
on some guy's house in the burbs. Seems he was buying puffer fish toxin under false pretenses (tetrodotoxin).
Supposedly one of the deadliest known. Also "natural" and "organic."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080701/...toxin_arrest_1
The opposite of love isn't hate.
It's apathy.
All other things equal, within
most relevant contexts, organic and natural is indeed better; though of course, you often are better served using
highly refined or synthetic substances as well. You just have to look at all relevant factors as well as the
context.
Denatured palm oil (for perfume) and jojoba oil (aromatherapy) are both great natural carriers,
depending on the context. I'd prefer either over synthetic carriers. But I doubt either are used in that particular
product. Jojoba is actually tricky for perfume, because it gets absorbed too readily.
DrSmellThis (creator of P H E R O S)
The newest release of AD's A314
came around the beginning of the year. It has a new fragrance, I believe called Akuto, and smells similar to freshly
showered ass with a wee bit of spicy EO. Not a great fragrance but I didn't care for the new age hippie scent of
the older one either. Both are not overpowering and easy to cover.
I have sensitive skin and find many colognes,
EOs, oils and contact with garden plants give me a rash, so the organic oil is usually safer for me.
"I'm just a dirty hornytoad" -Gegogi
I don't know how much harris has
tweaked A314, all I know is I got latest version 17 from AD with Akuto fragrance & this latest version is not that
effective as its previous version, also akuto smells horrible after a while
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks