Looking back on
the "Pheromone Discussion" Forum, I found the following information:
Since he has offered this "proof" that hisOriginally Posted by Archetypical Hybrid (HEC)
theory is correct, I hope that Archetypical Hybrid (HEC) will tell us whether the image he posted was part of a
published paper. I vaguely recall seeing something similar that was shown to me by the chemist for Erox corp., and
also that--at the time--he was using the chart to show that DHEA--second bar from the right on the
chart--(reportedly used in Winnifred Cutler's product) did not activate the human VNO, despite the obvious
comparable activity to Androstanone. If so, comparable activity would indicate that Androstanone is not active.
Perhaps it was another chart; I could be mistaken. If the chart was published, it would help to clarify
matters related to reports of human VNO activity that are no longer used in the marketing of "Natural Attraction
(TM)" (formerly Erox corporation) products (I noticed that the image is linked from the former "erox"
http://www.erox.com/images/Steroid2.GIF and the erox link now takes us to the Natural Attraction(TM) home
page).
This also brings me to an issue I have with debate about unreferenced research from unpublished or
anonymous sources. When exposed to scientific inquiry, these sources typically promptly dissapear, but may also then
reappear, again, with anonymity. Are you still "out there" Archetypical Hybrid (HEC)? Let's discuss pheromone
"science."
JVK
.com
Bookmarks