Balance or Supplement?

[tenaciousBLADE]

Hey

everybody
After reading so many hit stories around the forum, and also simple progress-of-experimentation

stories, I came across a thought (Yup, that happens sometimes lol).
How about making a thread where we all

can discuss this issue in an organized way?

What do I mean? Well, many times I've seen people here

stating that the `mones should (in their opinion) be a supplement to the users' natural signature; and many

other times have I seen others say the `mones should balance that signature

What do you

think?
And please elaborate... Why so?

I've made this thread a poll, so even if you don't really know

how to explain your point of view, you'd still be able to share it
But please , DO

at least try to explain your opinion.


P.S.
I'm aware that some of you might view it as a dependable

question; and then the answer to this poll should probably be "Well, it depends on the situation" or something of

the sort. If indeed this is your way of thinking, simply post that in a text reply, and explain what it is you mean



The reason I have not added that option in the voting arena, is that it might depend on many different

things. And a poll result ending in that option being the winner, would certainly not be conclusive at all



So people.. I hereby invite you to vote!

[tenaciousBLADE]

What?? has this no

interest in nobody??

[bronzie]

both questions are paradoxal,

you could say they could supplement, but it depends on your definition of supplement.

A food supplement is

possible for instance because it does not rely on genetic criteria to be called a supplement, but a pheromone

supplement is not, simply for the fact that natural pheromone production is unique and based on genetics, therefore

you cannot actually balance or supplement your own natural pheromones, its impossible.

You can only ADD

synthetic lab produced pheromones to your own pheromones, but this in no way balancing or supplementing your natural

pheromone signiture.

[tenaciousBLADE]

THANK you


Here was my first mistake driven from the factthat english ain't my native lenguage.
I'm glad someone

cared enough to explain it to me.


Yet, these terms were taken from posts in this forum... so I doubt that's

the reason nobody replyed... or is it?

Oh well...

[bronzie]

tenaciousBLADE, english is my

first language, although its not my mother language...im constantly using google search engine to 'spell check'

words! lol

dont worry, i dont think we are bieng assesed by anyone here for our fluency.


maybe you

meant... do synthetic pheromones add "punch" to our natural pheromones, or do synthetic pheromones "round off " and

give "scope" to our own natural production

the answer is yes, however, you have to remember the end result is

not our natural pheromone blueprint, not in the slightest.

this is one of my main concerns with synthetic

peromone use, and the question that i have raised before in this forum. others have raised this issue, although have

approached this in different ways.

[tenaciousBLADE]

well, it wasn't exactly

what I ment; but I agree with your final point there.