Now if we can only get the male pill the second sexual reveloution will happenOriginally Posted by belgareth
http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20060912/ts_csm/oafterpi
llx
What do you folks think?
Personally, I'm all for it. There's few things worse than babies
having babies and if that's what it takes to prevent these children from trying to raise children themselves, so be
it. The church is complaining that its vieled abortion and is wrong. Some political groups claim it is taking away
the parents' rights.
In the case of the church...So? Is the church able to prevent these pregnancies or take
care of the unwanted babies? If not, which is the case, then the church is out of line trying to prevent it.
In
the case of the parents, where are they when these kids are getting pregnant? Apparently they haven't been doing
their job protecting the kids by educating them. Why should their rights supercede the kids' rights?
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson
Now if we can only get the male pill the second sexual reveloution will happenOriginally Posted by belgareth
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks