I recently got my
PI + APC Combo plus lots of gel packs.
I cant smell PI but it did work definitely. Please share your experiments of
PI & APC
I recently got my
PI + APC Combo plus lots of gel packs.
I cant smell PI but it did work definitely. Please share your experiments of
PI & APC
Last edited by gklite; 10-04-2006 at 05:42 AM.
Don't think in terms of
"dominance" and "submissive". Women offer first acts of submission in many subtle ways that men often overlook or
misinterpret.
Men offer overt acts of submission to each other all day long.
For women interacting with men,
submission is an invitation to courtship and then maybe to something more.
For men interacting with men,
submission is a survival trait, sometimes a baiting scheme.
Using your male-on-male point of view to interpret a
woman's body language is counter-productive. It's like using a Greek-English dictionary to translate a Latin
text.
so u think that chattiness &
gazing are the signals of invitation? Can u recommend how shud i respond??
Say, "Hi. HowOriginally Posted by gklite
is your day going?"
Gazing is usually the first
invitation to approach. Its ironic how women often purposely give off submissive gestures (batting eyes, tilting
head, hair play) to get entice a guy to approach her. In effect, the guy, by approaching her, is actually
submitting to her.
There are a number of books that point to the idea that women play a bigger role in choosing
potential mates than men do, which is debatable. I think that at the very least, they share an equal role in the
matter.
Women do choose who they're attracted to and who they aren't usually before anyone actually approaches
them though. They are often unresponsive to those they haven't already noticed. Its for this reason that I never
blindly approach a woman without giving her an opportunity to notice me first. Nonverbal cues play a much bigger
role in attraction to women than men, and I make a point not to skip on this ever so important part.
Going back
to your hit though....a secret gaze is a very big indicator of interest, however the fact that she's trying to do
it without you noticing is a sign that she's uncomfortable with that attraction. Maybe she's naturally insecure,
maybe shes faithful to a boyfriend or husband who knows, but either way it seems she didn't want you to know that
she was attracted to you.
This sense of discomfort is something I notice a lot when I use PI. It can have some
pretty pronounced effects, but unless a woman is already fully comfortable with you, it tends to close them off and
it can often be counter-productive. Don't get me wrong, PI works really well when used at the right time, but its
not exactly a rapport establishing product. This is why mixes that focus on nols, a1, etc and a hint of none tend
to work more effectively than an all-out none barrage. None works well, but it can also create a wall of tension
and unapproachability. You want a woman to feel attracted to you, but also comfortable, fun, intimate, around you
as well.
trust me, she knows that you
saw her checking you out. in my experiance with women, they are playing games that we are not even cappable of
comprehanding. thier mating rituals are far more advance then how we do our things. and sometiems we don't even
know that we are being screened.
I'd say that the MAJORITY of guys don't know when theyOriginally Posted by slickracer
are being screened. Women have these behaviours because they make guys display unfakable fitness indicators
(confidence, socially educated, funny, able to deal with conflict, etc.); it's a way for women to cut through the
crap and find out fast if the guy is worth their time (granted, sometimes judgements can be a little hasty). Guys do
EXACTLY the same thing with women and their looks.
Does anyone know who are the
manufacturers of PI & Whats their website?
the reason TE didn't work
but PI did even tho they are NONE products is because PI has a higher concentration of NONE.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks