SoE...definatly.Proven
product,consistant results,hard if not impossible to OD on and in my oppinion underrated for sexuality.
SoE...definatly.Proven
product,consistant results,hard if not impossible to OD on and in my oppinion underrated for sexuality.
SOE. Because it is universally
effective, opening doors in nearly every situation (except solitary confinement and self flagellation). If you
can't get a date, close a deal or make friends with SOE you probably should shoot yourself as you're just plain
no-good. My only beef is the oil carrier and the funky rollon bottle. Oil stains clothing and isn't something
you'd want in your hair. Moreover, I'd be much happier with concentrated SOE in an alcohol carrier for dabbing or
mixing with a cologne.
My second choice is NPA because it helps give women the itch but, unfortunately,
isn't as universally useful as SOE. However, it is much more pleasant to apply mixed with cologne in an atomizer or
to dab.
"I'm just a dirty hornytoad" -Gegogi
I'd say Chikara. It's very well
rounded itself (containing 7 pheromones), so it works very well as a stand alone. It contains none so there's
always a chance of an offensive OD reaction, but its a relatively safe product compared to something like NPA.
Honestly I don't use Chikara much myself anymore, but if I had to go with one product, I'd go with Chikara, with
SOE in a very close second.
i recently ordered soe unscented. it came in the 10 ml roll on bottle, but is alcohol based.Originally Posted by Gegogi
did the formulation change recently?
I wish. That oily feel is
actually oil...
"I'm just a dirty hornytoad" -Gegogi
It isn't oil in the same way
Primal is oil though; SOE is dpg/alcohol based.
Come on, now, people, there
have to be more opinions than these on which onepheromone product would be The Choice if you could only choose
one!
I'm not sure if I could
choose... it would be between AE, TE and Chikara.
You can only choose one!
LoL...well...I think your gonna
find a pretty even split with Chikara and SoE.
I kind of expected to hear a
lot of NPA.
Well sheesh, who has to really
choose only one? That's like only having one girlfriend, one camera body, one CD or one guitar... Life is more fun
by the dozen! I think the most basic pheromone locker needs at least two kickin' 'mones, one predominately social
and another mainly sexual. Then you're ready for anything.
"I'm just a dirty hornytoad" -Gegogi
Funny you should mention "one
camera body". *Looks around and sees seven*
And hmm, I only have one girlfriend... maybe I should have a
mistress too? Or three?
I wish. lol
Repeat after me:
"I
deserve a harem"
There we go.
And how brother! I feel most comfortable and happy with 2 or 3 girlfriends or a wife and"I deserve a
harem"
mistress or two (that's why my wife left me...). It seems like the natural order of things. Now my grandfather had
5 wives (at once). Of course he was back in the old country where such practices were normal among well to do
gentlemen up until the Korean War. My father had a wife and long term mistress, so it's sort of in my genes. The
problem now is American women were messed up royal when given the right to vote less than 100 years ago. It's been
downhill ever since as they demand more and more. It's really unfair...
"I'm just a dirty hornytoad" -Gegogi
Actually, I have concluded that I do. Funny youOriginally Posted by CptKipling
should say that. It seems to be in my genes...
One should have a wife in everyOriginally Posted by catlord17
country. Going home would be like going for a holiday
Everything begins with an attitude.
You guys are making me feel likeOriginally Posted by itwow
I'm not insane all of a sudden! lol I'd say you're reading my mind,but if we're all men, I'd say you're just
responding to the same genetic urges. I wasn't thinking a wife in every country... but certainly a house with at
least one lady in each of a few countries!
I suspect we're going to start a war of the sexes if we continue
talking like this, though. The ladies have exactly the opposite genetic programming. lol
Now then, what were we
talking about?
"I suspect we're going to
start a war of the sexes if we continue talking like this, though. The ladies have exactly the opposite genetic
programming."
Yeah be careful.
I was actually being slightly tongue in cheek, but actually I don't see a
problem with having a few women around at once (f-buddies, dating etc) as long as everybody is being honest and
everyone knows exactly where they stand. Some people feel comfortable with that - good for them.
I would be wary
of pursuing the "I am a product of my genes" mentality though; if we all did that the world wouldn't be a happy
place.
I'd like to have a number of
girls to date at once, but I'm not going to trythat while I'm involved withsomeone as sensitive and jealous as my
current girlfriend! lol Genetic programming isn't the only thing going on in my head.
Where I live it's kind of
half-expected that men should have a second girlfriend, as long as you have the money to support both it's...
accepted. My girlfriend tells me emphatically that I can fuck around as long as I don't fall in love. My american
upbringing has had me questioning this for the past 3 years that we've been together... but now I don't really
protest, I just say "thanks darling, that's really sweet of you"
As is one's thought, so one becomes. This is an eternal mystery. -Maitri Upanishad
In terms of infidelity,women are
almost twice as likely to cheat on thier husbands as men are to cheat on thier wives.So dont get the idea that a
womens "programing" is all that different than your own.According to a study that was very quickly silenced done by
the AMA,almost twenty percent of the children born in the US to married couples in hospitals were fathered by
someone OTHER than the husband.
A woman has, however, many more
opportunites to cheat than a man does.
"An investment in knowledge always pays the best interest."
--Benjamin Franklin
Good point bjf...very good
point.
So...back to the original topic of this thread...have we all prety much settled on SoE and or Chickara as
the "one" product if we could only choose one?
I thought that study was in the UK? Doesn'tOriginally Posted by tim929
matter really, probably similar figures. Where do you hear that women are nearly twice as likely to have affairs?
I'm not protesting, but, I've also heard anthopological theories on sex patterns of men and women and how it
behooves men to spread the DNA to as wide of a possible 'audience' and how in turn, women need to find a stable
male with enough resources to support her for 9+ months. That's why marriage is primarily an institution for
women's sake. When I chat with women friends, more of them are interested in finding one guy they can be
with,whereas my male friends want as much variety as possible.
My thinking is that humans in general could
benefit from maturing spiritually so that we have enough self worth and not feel threatened or jealous when the
natural, inevitable happens: your lover finds someone else attractive too!
As is one's thought, so one becomes. This is an eternal mystery. -Maitri Upanishad
Originally Posted by junglesitar
It's a good thought and I'd love to see it too. But it isn't likely for a while yet, we've got a lot of
growing to do before that can happen.
Actually, marriage is mostly for children rather than women.
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson
I recall CNN.com has several recent articles on thisWhere do you hear that
women are nearly twice as likely to have affairs?
topic. Of course it varies from culture to culture. Westerners stray the most. However, European women, especially
Brits, were cited as much more sexually activate outside of marriage than American women. Nevertheless, the men and
women were nearly equal in their respective cultures. However, these studies depend on the honesty of those in the
study group. I wonder if the difference in the stats are due to more or less honesty or actual behavior?
I've had a number of affairs with married women and noticed an oddity. All of them believed in marriage,
loved their husbands and were basically in denial over their affairs. In fact two of them were born-again Christians
and extremely conservative in their moral and political views. And yet they did it anyway, suffering great guilt. It
was something so dark and hidden they wouldn't admit it anyone, and yet they were willing to risk it all to sneak
around. Lordy, it must be that dad burn NPA I was wearing...
"I'm just a dirty hornytoad" -Gegogi
I personally think it would be
in all our best interests to just admit we are driven by the desire to eat, sleep, and f*ck, and until we advance
beyond that spiritually, just accept it and stop making such a big deal of it.
I've told my gf numerous
times, "Hey, if you want to have fun, just discuss it with me so I know what's going on, and use protection!" Of
course, she won't do that, because she knows I expect the same freedoms she has, and she wants me all to herself.
She thinks I'm going to leave her if I have sex with someone else.
But back to the topic of this
thread... lol So far I haven't noticed a whole lot of result from SOE... it does seem to make me more talkative,
but I haven't see it cause a lot of response in others yet. Chikara I like the scent of, but I have only had the
chance to test it once, although I got a nice hit, but that was with a nice does of SOE and TE also.
That's exactlyI personally think it
would be in all our best interests to just admit we are driven by the desire to eat, sleep, and f*ck, and until we
advance beyond that spiritually, just accept it and stop making such a big deal of it.
the kind of bad thinking I was talking about.
Ultimately our purpose is to survive and then pass on our genes.
In todays world survival mostly means getting a good education, a good job, staying healthy and staying out of
trouble. Passing on our genes is not just about sewing your seed, its about raising a kid so that they have the
ability to survive and replicate themselves - something which happens more effectively in a mature and stable family
unit.
Our bodies evolved millions of yeas ago, the environment that we need to survive and breed in has
drastically changed. The desires of a caveman were designed to optimise his chances of survival and breeding, but
the same desires are not adapted for modern life. To assume that they are is reductionist and foolish.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks