Androstadienone vs Estratatraenol - again

[NaughtieGirl]

I am spending quite a bit of time researching all the different stand-alone products. Whereas most of

the men seem to be looking for sexual hits, I think the focus here on the women's forum is improving an existing

relationship.

I was hoping to come up with a list of standalone products along with a description of what

each of them does. This morning I spent about 2 hours researching Androstadienone. Finally I came across this - in a

nutshell - Estratatraenol makes men feel good and Androstadienone makes women feel good. I'll post my extensive

blabla as soon as I'm done with my estratatraenol research. I don't quite understand why a -nol has been compared

to a -none, but I'll just go with the flow. I should have researched androstadienol! <img>

Now, am I dreaming

this or was one of you searching for a source of straight estratatraenol a couple of weeks ago and I suggested you

do a google search because I was too busy at the time.
Was that you Charmed? Did you find anything?
Bruce...

would you know of a source? Stone Labs does not offer it, do they? And this link in the archives seems to

be a dead end as well.

For now, just for the heck of it: Here's an interesting tidbit I came across.

According to one site I came across: Quote:
Realm® comes in two types: one intended for application

on men, and another intended for application on women. The men's version enhances male well-being; the

woman's version enhances female well-being. Seems strange, doesn't it? After all, the purpose of wearing

cologne is the attraction of a mate, so it seems logical to assume that the male version would enhance a

female's sense of well-being, so that women who are in proximity to a pheromonally supplemented man would

feel good while they are in his presence. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that a man could apply

Realm® for Women and increase his success in dating.

Or that we could wear the men's version (or

unscented for men) to enhance our mate's sense of wellbeing.
However, the amounts of estratatraenol must be

minute because the men's version is actually quite inexpensive and surfs_up said it is a very expensive

pheromone.

After I'm done with this study I would like to look into Alpha-androstenol vs Beta-androstenol vs

Androstadienol.

That's it for now. Gotto work once in a while too!

[InACharmedLife]

No, I'm searching for

methoxyestateraene, which, in a study done by Regina Maiworm, was shown to make men assess women as more attractive,

kinder, nicer, i.e. more positively. (It is to be worn by women)
I think this substance shows the most promise for

enhancing an existing romantic relationship, as well as for igniting one with someone new.
I have no idea where to

get it, and I welcome any leads!

[NaughtieGirl]

Hey Charmed,

I will add it to the top of my list. From your previous posts, I know you're someone

who delves deep into things as well.

I think my attention got diverted from Androstadienol to Androstadienone

(A1) because alledgedly Androstadienol is a precursor to -none. I'd like to study the -nols and similar substances

first, then the -nones and maybe not the -rones.

Boy, when I read through the archives - some of these guys

know so much! Makes one almost afraid to ask a question. <img> But curiosity will prevail!