Understood and
agreed, but the reason I replied in specific ASF jargon was because I immediately recognized the OP as an ASF'er,
and thought that, to him, it would get my point across better. There was also a tongue-in-cheek element to my post
as well. It seemed a little "off" to propose that pheromones, and all the science behind them, are invalid, while
meanwhile, the guys on the seduction sites break down elements of human dating & seduction behavior to such levels
of complexity, that computer jargon would seem *clear* by comparison, (hence the tongue-in-cheek element.) I promise
not to post regularly in ASF jargon here, only when I'm trying to make a point.
And BTW, I work in I.T., so
feel free to dish out all the tech jargon you want, I can take it.
Bookmarks