Isn't PCC designed to be worn
by women??
I've been experimenting
with PCC alone and in conjunction with other pheromones for quite some time now. By the way, I am a 36 year old
man.
Here are the things I've noticed in me:
Increased assertiveness, confidence and somewhat of a "buzz"
not too much different than what I get from none only.
I tend to have sexual fantasies about just about every
woman in site, even the uglier ones. I feel more of a desire to approach and say something to women I don't know.
I also tend to be more outspoken and feel more of a need to assert myself and even speak out of turn.
As far as
the reactions of women are concerned, it's hard to say because there are times when I've gotten a strange look
from women. This strange look is hard too explain but it can be described as a "you have something I want, but I'm
not necessarily attracted to you" look. Not a DIHL look, but a very subtle look as if she's a little jealous of me
for some strange reason. Any man who puts a little dab of PCC on the neck or under the chin with nothing else knows
the look I'm talking about.
In summary, I like how it makes me feel but using it alone to attract women
doesn't seem to be a good idea. I believe the key in attracting women is in making them submissive and receptive,
but PCC does almost the opposite.
Isn't PCC designed to be worn
by women??
i'm not sure if it's this that
causes the "you have something I want, but I'm not necessarily attracted to you"-look: i have read that PCC gives
you partly (?) the "smell" of a woman. now, women are competitive and what i have noticed, when i walk with an
attractive woman on my arm or other ways show that we are close / intimate / whatever, i tend to get much more looks
from other attractive women that walk by me and the woman on my arm. as i said, women are competitive and if you are
succesful with women, you draw women to you. ever had that feeling of when you're out with women (gf, friend, etc),
you get more looks or attention from the opposite sex? from this reaction i draw my conclusion that when you wear
PCC, women sense (unconsciously) that you have been with a woman, because you smell sort of like one or something
and they feel that i they should compete for you, because you are succesful and / or scarce.
any other
thoughts?
I'm not sure if it's a
competitive thing so much as a value thing. Women are fairly competitive, but this rarely applies to strangers who
are already "with someone." For example, if I see a guy out with a girl, I'm not about to try to compete with her
for him. This competitiveness is much more likely to apply with a guy who's not necessarily with anyone. For
example, usually I'm the type to wait for guys to come to me. But if I see an attractive guy at a party who has
lots of women flirting with him, I'm more likely to go flirt with him as well because I'm competitive. Keep in
mind, however, that this only applies with the bolder ones. If a woman is naturally shy, the fact that a guy is
surrounded by other girls will make her shy away. Also, if a woman feels like she is less attractive than the other
girls, she also might stay away. After all, we fear rejection too.
More likely, the reactions you are getting
that seem to stem from competativeness is actually coming from a woman reassessing your "value", if you will. If a
guy is with a girlfriend, out on a date, being pursued by other girls, or seems like it (due to pheromones or
whatever) has been confirmed, in a woman's eyes, as worthy. A not-so-attractive guy with a girlfriend is more
attractive to us because we know that she must see something in him we can't tell from the surface. Maybe he's
really nice, or really charming, not afraid to committ, or any number of things. This especially applies to
potential relationships because a guy might be hot as all get out but simply not boyfriend material. So if he does
have a girlfriend, we're not more attracted to him because we want to steal him away, but rather because we know
he's tried and true relationship fodder.
Bottom line: If we know that a guy can get girls, we are more
attracted to him because it means he's doin' something right.
Hope this helps.
~Silver
When I wear PCC alone I still get attention from women but more oftenOriginally Posted by phinmone
than not, the looks I get are mostly blank expressionless stares. Unlike other pheromones, in which I get a lot of
bright smiling faces.
I have a theory that perhaps they (the women) are actually "undressing me with their eyes"
and are concealing thoughts with their blank expressions. I have no way of telling since I can't read their minds.
More experimentation is necessary.
By the way, PCC + nol or beta-nol is a powerful combination. There's no
doubt that it works.
Okay,Originally Posted by Silver
here's a question to the guys on this forum....after reading Silver's post, don't you recognize how good it is AT
CERTAIN TIMES (no offense, Silver, but most of the posters in this section are guys--lol) to have a woman around to
explain things from their point of view?
To respnd to your comment, Silver, dang right, it helps. You made your
point pretty clear to me.
a really nice guy with an attractive woman? i don't think so...Originally Posted by Silver
Originally Posted by Silver
sounds all pretty nice, but this does NOT concern only the guys with their
girlfriends, but also a men surrounded by girls.
my experience. i was with my female friends at a club and i
was making some jokes and they were laughing and standing close to me (3). after awhile there was this one girl,
which was quite forthcoming and was seeking for my attention. nice
-
Why do women compete anyway? I
think men are not as competitive as women are, when it comes down to chasing an already taken woman in a club /
party etc.
it is harder for women to find a good, loyal partner than a just a short term partner. women's
behaviour for seeking a partner is a result of women's biology and the creation of the evolution. if a woman gets
impregnant, she has to carry the child for 9 months. but a guy can make a women imgregnant in a few minutes (or
seconds! ). this is one of the reasons why women seek for good partners. it does not really matter if someone is
taken, as soon as he has good genes / is loyal, they seek for these men, because they have more "value" (thank you
silver). of course the social barriers mostly / sometimes prevent this kind of a bad behaviour (taking someones
partner)
Oh darling, a lot more often than you'd think. MyOriginally Posted by phinmone
roommate dated an ass-ugly guy for about a year, and she's the cutest thing.
Besides, it happens a lot more
often than a really nice woman with an attractive guy :-P
Darkman:
Thanks always glad to help.
~Momo
sweety, she dated him for about a year and then got sick & bored of him, because HE wasOriginally Posted by Silver
doing everything for her, followed her around, called her everyday and never said no for anything she asked, changed
his own plans after her plans, paid her all the dinners in the first dates, had NO control in the relationship =
nice guy = WUSSY = DOORMAT = PROVIDER. that's why she dumbed him, right?
silver, attraction is not a
choice and this kind of relationships do exist, MASSIVELY. they do not last long, because most women want
unconsciously to be leaded, altough the opposite usually happens. most women "train" their boyfriends into nice guys
as the relationship developes. and this leads to something that women do not feel attracted to.
it's a
twisted world.
Or maybe he dumped her. I've dumped really nice women after I got tired of them."sweety, she dated him for
about a year and then got sick & bored of him, because HE was doing everything for her, followed her around, called
her everyday and never said no for anything she asked, changed his own plans after her plans, paid her all the
dinners in the first dates, had NO control in the relationship = nice guy = WUSSY = DOORMAT = PROVIDER. that's why
she dumbed him, right?"
The fact is, you can get bored with anyone after awhile and variety is the spice of life. Plus, most humans don't
mate for life. Hmm, my girlfriend just dumped me, but that was only after her husband found out about us. He's such
a nice guy he forgave her. But she's a total nympho so she'll be back in action again I'm sure.
"I'm just a dirty hornytoad" -Gegogi
Or he dumped her...yeah...assumptions like that shouldn't be made untilOriginally Posted by phinmone
you ask for details, hun.
She dated him because he was nice, really really smart, ambitious, and caring...the
same reason a girl dates an attractive guy, if she's smart. They broke up the same way many relationship do,
because they had grown apart and always seemed to be fighting for no reason. My friend didn't want the breakup
because she wanted to try and salvage the caring relationship they had had, but even she could see that the problems
were evident.
These assumptions you make about women in general are simply not sure, at least not for most
educated women. I most definitely do NOT want a man to lead me. I don't want a guy who does everything I say,
true, but that's because I wouldn't consider a guy worthy unless he's a fabulous person in his own right. I want
a guy with his own opinions, his own sharp mind, and his own LIFE that doesn't 100% center around me. I want a guy
who will challenge me, who will tease me, whom I can have fun with, and who will grow with me...but never have I
ever sought a guy to lead me.
Bottom line? Men - I want them, I love them...but I sure as HELL don't need
them. So if they want a place in my life, they better earn it.
~Silver
Dang Silver, you a real woman!
Incidentally, maybe it's because I work on a college campus (60% female!), but I meet lots of women with Silver's
attitude and views. Many a time I've seen clueless (read: unprepared) but extremely confident young males boss
around females in group projects, only to leave the assignment dickless and with balls in hand. The next time around
they still don't get it...
"I'm just a dirty hornytoad" -Gegogi
Or maybe she dumped him because he was tooOriginally Posted by phinmone
demanding and domineering. I've seen that a lot too. You have a very narrow view of a wide world.
I'd pick a
woman who challenges me and I can challenge over one who wants to be dominated anytime. I want a woman beside me,
not a pet.
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson
How about perception and PCC - or
couplins in the perception water based formula (now there is an idea !)
Couplins products are too stinky to mix. It will"or couplins in the
perception water based formula (now there is an idea !)"
probably fester and ruin perception. If you need couplins, apply directly to yourself.
"I'm just a dirty hornytoad" -Gegogi
I don't think the word is "lead." Women want a man that willOriginally Posted by Silver
protect them, most do. A provider, caregiver, and friend. Saying women want men to lead them is wrong. I think it is
really meant to say women want a guy to be "the head", so to speak. Not like Stalin or anything, but in terms of a
family, she wants a guy that can handle things, look out for the well being of his woman and/or children. A take
charge kind of guy, but not one who will abuse that power with her. I think this is it. Silver, am I close?
Well, you're closer.
What
you said may be true for some women, especially perhaps more old fashioned ones, but many parts of it also no longer
apply to most.
While I can't pretend to speak for ALL women, I think I can safely say I speak for most young
20-some college or post-collegiate women.
We do want a man who will protect us, who's quick to defend our
honor, who sees us as worth protecting...but we don't want a man who leaps to assume that we always NEED defending.
I like a man to stand up for me, and a protective gesture is always much appreciated, but I wouldn't want him to
treat me like a child and assume I can't handle my own problems. Protect me from the drunken guy at the bar,
protect me from the pain I feel after a particularly bad phone call with my mother, but don't assume I can't deal
with the rude guy in the grocery shop or an unfair boss.
Some women are looking for a guy to be "the head", but
I have never myself. What I, and most modern women, are looking for is a partner. I want him to be a provider and
caregiver for my children, although that's a lil' far to be thinking in the future, but I can provide for myself
thank you very much. Caring for me is essential, and a little TLC and pampering after an especially trying day is a
godsend, but caregiving on a regular basis is unnecessary.
I want a take charge kind of guy, yes, but take
charge as in "takes charge of his own life", not mine. I've got a perfectly good head on my shoulders, why would I
need another?
~Silver
(btw, sorry to kind of take over your thread, tiger, I know we've lost the copulins
subject sort of, but hope you don't mind and find this useful. if not, just say the word. )
Silver, does this apply to homeless
women, too?
Just kidding, good post.
I'd like to hear more about
copulins and perception.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks