Pheromones effectiveness

[SLK]

Hi,

IMO,

pheromones effectiveness should be measured through interactions. I find that most newbies field testing the

pheromones are expecting approaches from women. Quite simply, god never designed men and women this way. However,

once communication flows with a simple "hi", then observe the magic.

One product which consistently

increases my overall appeal with women has been NPA/TE. Whether its a group outing or a date, women perceived me as

the most attractive in the group. Of course, you have to be social but not necessarily trying to show "I am the man"

or anything like that.

So, lets do some justice to pheromones and not judge their effectiveness on the wrong

factors.

Cheers
SLK

[BassMan]

Hi,

IMO, pheromones

effectiveness should be measured through interactions. I find that most newbies field testing the pheromones are

expecting approaches from women. Quite simply, god never designed men and women this way. However, once

communication flows with a simple "hi", then observe the magic.

Women not approaching men is a

provincial issue. I've lived in times and places where it was perfectly acceptable (say, Austin in the 70's). One

doesn't need to create a "designing god" to account for local custom.

With all due respect, I appeal to webby

to remove the points given for starting threads... (alright, I'll add a smiley)

[SLK]

Women not approaching

men is a provincial issue. I've lived in times and places where it was perfectly acceptable (say, Austin in the

70's). One doesn't need to create a "designing god" to account for local custom.

With all due respect, I

appeal to webby to remove the points given for starting threads...

True enough, but I was just

stating the major trend where men approach women rather than the other way around.

SLK

[watcher27944]

Bassman,,,The 70`s are gone

dude.

[BassMan]

Bassman,,,The

70`s are gone dude.

Yeah, unfortunately.

I get approached by women, not usually in the "I want to do you"

sense, although that has happened recently. I don't hang in those types of bars any more.

It's not unusual

for a woman I don't know to start a conversation with me. And from reading others here, I gathered it's not that

unusual for some others.

I was really just objecting to the "god made men and women that way" tone of the

original post. Sorry. I just think that's incorrect.

-Bass

[DrSmellThis]

With all due

respect, I appeal to webby to remove the points given for starting threads... (alright, I'll add a smiley)

........

[eric_pelletier_tw]

well got an update for

ya.Coincidence? God know ...
i had a meeting[13:30] before i got to work [3:30PMtechnicaly] well i was late a bit

got in at 4:00PM-4:30PM instead of blah sould blah blah not be blah late stuff i got a handshake a "jovial" smile &

"got lost or somthing ?" question ... kida bizare [boss never shake hand only says hi]

ps: if you asking

yourself "meeting before work ??" well "work" is a contract with a company & "meeting" is with my real employer[the

one that sign the checks]

exept that i had a blodie look at me in the bus going home [9PM],
nothing too

flamable ...

[CollegeStudent]

well got an update for ya.Coincidence? God know ...
i had a meeting[13:30] before i got

to work [3:30PMtechnicaly] well i was late a bit got in at 4:00PM-4:30PM instead of blah sould blah blah not be blah

late stuff i got a handshake a "jovial" smile & "got lost or somthing ?" question ... kida bizare [boss never shake

hand only says hi]

ps: if you asking yourself "meeting before work ??" well "work" is a contract with a

company & "meeting" is with my real employer[the one that sign the checks]

exept that i had a blodie look at

me in the bus going home [9PM],
nothing too flamable ...

Um.... What did he say?

[CptKipling]

Hah! Couldn't understand it? I

bet your embarrassed now...

He was telling us about a slightly (not overly) flammable blodie.

[Gegogi]

Hmm, I'm on the shy side but

women come after me all the time. Wearing NPA or TE has increased to the trend. I guess they weren't listening to

God...

[eric_pelletier_tw]

he simply asked if i

was lost cose i couldnt find them in the 40 stories (or so) tower
i did the 3 usual ones 23,22,11 but they where

on the 24 th i went back at our "office" to find that out ...

As for that blonde well only got looks, nothing

too serious ...
i think that is almost if not the only time mones worked in there predictable way [how they are

suposed to work]

well my 1st TE paket is gone :P so ill try SoE scented Gell (+a long weekend pause of 3 days)

relults so far [things i remeber & noticed out of usual] :got ppl talking at bus stop,got a few air twirling looks &

the event i mentioned erlier : 2 drops [3mm diameter ]of gel is best for now .

I will try going out with 1/8

1/4 1/2 of the TE with the other paket i have.

Same with soe ill add to that a few 1/16 packet to start slow

...

conclusion : mones defenitly work somtimes but i get more looks & attractivness in large groups if im not

wearing them [i tried to look for body language before during & after wearing them] altho i didnt try massive

amounts (like 1/2) i cant realy put much anyhow only tried behind ears & on neck [i feel bad when i put it

on my wrists like if im stinky or somthing ] more testing is required in hopes to find the magic combo.. :P

[jub]

I

don’t see anything wrong with newbies expecting approaches from women as one of many criteria’s for field

testing pheromone effectiveness.





Don’t forget its just one of many ‘criteria’s'.





While as 'interactions' are just another criteria. And the God part

doesn't really come into it! Women will approach men if they really fancy them and vice versa but this is also

reliant on other factors.

[eric_pelletier_tw]

i believe they work

but there is much more to geting-some then mones...

[Pancho1188]

I was really

just objecting to the "god made men and women that way" tone of the original post. Sorry. I just think that's

incorrect.

Gender bias - Yes
Psychological certainty - No

Testosterone and other masculine traits

makes men more likely to take risks, but that doesn't mean that women cannot approach men.

Again, it's natural

for men as a gender to be trying to hook up with anything in sight and for women to be selective because men are

trying to hook up with anything in sight (or because women try to select the best mate for reproduction)...but that

doesn't mean it has to be that way.

The reason most women don't approach men is just the law of supply and

demand. If attractive women get approached many times every night (high demand, limited supply), then why on earth

would they ever have a reason to approach some random guy? Where's the motivation? They can be choosey with the

guys they have in front of them. Hell, they can treat men like dirt ('charge a high price' in the supply/demand

analogy) if they want to because there will always be someone willing to pay that price to get laid.

On the

other hand, take a guy who has a few good choices and finds himself competing with every guy around for their

attention (high supply, limited demand), what is he going to have to do to outdo the others? He needs to prove

himself because there are so many other options and not that many attractive women looking.

Yes, there is a

slight gender factor. You cannot discount it. It works in the stock market as well. Women perform better than men in

general because they're not as aggressive. It works in the dating world. Men have the instinct to want women (and

men could verify that this instinct can reach insane levels), which motivates them to attempt to reproduce with

them. However, this gender bias may easily be overcome. For instance, you don't see me hitting on every person I

want. You don't see women sitting back waiting for their lives to happen. On the other hand, you see a lot of

lonely guys and a lot of take-charge girls.

[BassMan]

The reason most

women don't approach men is just the law of supply and demand. If attractive women get approached many times every

night (high demand, limited supply), then why on earth would they ever have a reason to approach some random guy?

Where's the motivation? They can be choosey with the guys they have in front of them. Hell, they can treat men like

dirt ('charge a high price' in the supply/demand analogy) if they want to because there will always be someone

willing to pay that price to get laid.

Well, as I said in another post, I've had many close female friends

this lifetime. They pretty much all say the same thing: It's really easy for a gal to get laid. It's a whole lot

harder for a gal to get laid by somebody to whom she is really attracted. Probably harder than for a guy, because

she has to filter out a whole lot more noise than a guy would. So if a female knows what she wants, and is

reasonably secure in her own sexuality, she's going to be pretty motivated if she's attracted enough...

Most

females I've known are so completely turned off by their experiences with the sexual capabilities of the males

they've been with that they just don't bother...

-Bass