If you listen
oh so carefully, you can just hear the eggs drop... Once you get good at it, the sound can become deafening in a
crowd of women. Then and only then shall thee don androstenone.
I originally sent this as a private message to jkohl when he posted a response to
someone's post with a link to one of his papers. I read the paper and had a few questions... he hasn't responded
back to my private message yet so I assume he's too busy to answer. So I decided to post it here to see what
everyone had to say. If you have any answers, I'd be interested in hearing them... anyway, here's the private
message I sent:
Hello, I'm 18 years old and have been reading the posts on the love-scent forum
for a few weeks now. You posted a link to one of your papers, "Integrating Neuroendocrinology and Ethology"
in one of your posts which I read over and found very interesting... I have a few questions.
You mention that
androstenol quickly changes to androstenone when produced by humans. Do the products on love-scent also follow suit?
Does the androstenol in SoE, for example, quickly change to androstenone in a matter of 20 minutes after being
applied?
Tell me if I am correct, it seems from your paper that the only time androstenone
is beneficial to a male trying to attract a female is when she is ovulating, otherwise the smell of androstenone
seems unattractive to a female. Now a question, does androstenol still seem appealing to a female even while she is
ovulating? If so, then is androstenol or androstenone more appealing to a female at time of ovulation? It seems
clear that androstenol is far more appealing to a female than androstenone when the female is not
ovulating.
Based on the information in your paper, if a male does not know the ovulation
stage of a female or is coming into close contact with many females, is it advantageous to be wearing androstenol
pheremones since it is more likely that the woman will not be ovulating and therefore, androstenone would only be
unpleasant to the female whereas androstenol would increase the perceived attractiveness of the male to the
female?
Thanks very much for taking the time to read and answer my
questions.
So, that was my e-mail... the link to the paper
is here:
http://www.nel.edu/22_5/NEL220501R01_Review.htm
Thanks to all who take the time to read and respond!
If you listen
oh so carefully, you can just hear the eggs drop... Once you get good at it, the sound can become deafening in a
crowd of women. Then and only then shall thee don androstenone.
"I'm just a dirty hornytoad" -Gegogi
Judging from the smell, the change BEGINS pretty quickly. Judging from the effects theOriginally Posted by Lagrimas
overall conversion is pretty subtle.
Originally Posted by Lagrimas
Yes.
Hard to say. ButOriginally Posted by Lagrimas
androstenone gives a stronger sexual response.
Not in my experience, orOriginally Posted by Lagrimas
that of many of the forum members. I would say it depends on the quantities used. Relatively large quantities of
androstenol are more appealing than the same amounts of androstenone.
I think they work best inOriginally Posted by Lagrimas
combination.
Disclaimer: I am not a scientist. The advice given is for practical purposes only.
Give truth a chance.
a.k.a sums it up well.
Remember, praticle experiences do not always agree with what the science says should happen, the usefullness of
-none being an obvious case here.
I agree with Kip. The trick
with -none is to use enough so that if a woman is ovulating she'll be more attracted to you, but not enough to
repulse her if she's not. It takes experimentation to find that amount for you.
DrSmellThis (creator of P H E R O S)
I think not only is none the most
important mone, it is also the most overated mone.
I'd be willing to bet Perception is more effective on
average than AE/m.
Interesting comment. What do
you mean by overrated, bjf?
DrSmellThis (creator of P H E R O S)
people use way too much of
it.
Most successful mixes, its contents will be in the overwhelming minority, and I am not just talking below
50 percent here.
Another thing to keep in mind: Even with a product like NPA or TE, it is still only
half.
Those studies about women being repulsed by none are pretty damn right. They're not going to like it
unless their smell receptors are picking up on other pheromones that send other signals as well. The none can only
be one signal in an overall picture you are painting. I'm convinced it is basically just an aggression
signal.
Without a touch of aggressiveness, however, you are basically not that useful to women (must protect,
hunt). People can see the differences between non none and none mixes are night and day. It is the deal breaker or
maker, unlike any of the others, which you can get away without having on. So that is why I say it is the most
important pheromone out there; just don't over-do it.
interesting way to put it.Originally Posted by bjf
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks