Johnny_Phero
01-26-2004, 01:53 PM
I\'ve been reading up on diluting some of the more concentrated pheromone products (ie. NPA) via mixing w/ less
concentrated products and/or \"cutting\" them w/ grain alcohol or lotion and seem to be finding mixed opinions on
the matter. Many peeps seem to take the stance that more surface area covered (lower mg mones/in.^2 of skin) yields
better results due to greater dispersion (also allows for more total mg applied w/o OD).
The opposing viewpoint
to this (which is a possible explanation of better/worse rxns to NPA compared to TE) is that a certain concentration
of a pheromone (in this case -none + secret ingredients) must be achieved to obtain optimal results. I\'ve found
numerous threads specifically discussing PPA\'s \"magic\" concentration of .015% -none, which seems to
strengthen this latter argument.
Obviously, a topic such as this is inherently subjective, but I was just hoping
to get some of your most recent opinions on the matter.
Thanks.
concentrated products and/or \"cutting\" them w/ grain alcohol or lotion and seem to be finding mixed opinions on
the matter. Many peeps seem to take the stance that more surface area covered (lower mg mones/in.^2 of skin) yields
better results due to greater dispersion (also allows for more total mg applied w/o OD).
The opposing viewpoint
to this (which is a possible explanation of better/worse rxns to NPA compared to TE) is that a certain concentration
of a pheromone (in this case -none + secret ingredients) must be achieved to obtain optimal results. I\'ve found
numerous threads specifically discussing PPA\'s \"magic\" concentration of .015% -none, which seems to
strengthen this latter argument.
Obviously, a topic such as this is inherently subjective, but I was just hoping
to get some of your most recent opinions on the matter.
Thanks.