'mark as edited'

[Xehupatl]

Wouldn\'t it be better to remove that button? I mean, you can go back and change your posts without anybody knowing you did it! If some idiot posts crap, let him/her stand by their opinion, not give them the option of sneakily editing their messages afterwards!
*hertfillingwithpatriotism*

[Phantom]

Are you talking about removing the ability of post editing completely or just that option ? /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif

[Xehupatl]

no just have every edited post marked as being such. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif

[Phantom]

no its fine how it is /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/mad.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif, sometimes I make grammar mistakes and having that \"post was edited\" thingy takes away from me being a perfectionist.

[upsidedown]

As it is now you have the option to make changes without it showing up as edited. All you have to do is uncheck the \"mark as edited\" button. The way it is now you have an option of doing it quietly or drawing attention to yourself. I think it\'s fine the way it is now.

[Xehupatl]

okok well it seems there\'s a time limit for editing past messages. So that makes everything ok ...

<font color=\"red\"> I SAID: PUT THE BUNNY BACK IN THE BOX!! </font>

[Xehupatl]

by the way ... this though just occurred to me: why doesn\'t Bruce have an individual color for his name? Make it dark red and let\'s call him \'kaizer\'

wee-haw!