View Full Version : Summary of research please
shawnk3
11-30-2008, 03:43 PM
Hi guys-- I
tried reading through the research subsection of the forum but it's very dry and has not been updated in quite some
time.
If any of the long-time veterans (Terry :) or idesign?) feel like they have a pretty good handle on the
research that's come out on mones, could you please post a summary?
My understanding (from limited reading) is
that:
-none produced changes in women's chemical levels.
-nol actually led females to RATE pictures of males
(and the males themselves) as more attractive and date-able than if the females were not exposed to mones.
-rone...I'm not sure about.
Also, I was thinking that since JVKohl (the inventor of SOE) is one of the
foremost researchers in the field of mones, would he not have created a none-heavy or rone-heavy product if he felt
that either of them were extremely effective for "gettin love" from the other gender? As far as I know, he only
makes SOE which has a 4:1 nol:rone ratio.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts/guidance.
5alphareductase
12-31-2008, 09:55 PM
Hi guys-- I tried reading through the research subsection of the forum but it's very dry and
has not been updated in quite some time.
If any of the long-time veterans (Terry :) or idesign?) feel like they
have a pretty good handle on the research that's come out on mones, could you please post a summary?
My
understanding (from limited reading) is that:
-none produced changes in women's chemical levels.
-nol
actually led females to RATE pictures of males (and the males themselves) as more attractive and date-able than if
the females were not exposed to mones.
-rone...I'm not sure about.
Also, I was thinking that since JVKohl
(the inventor of SOE) is one of the foremost researchers in the field of mones, would he not have created a
none-heavy or rone-heavy product if he felt that either of them were extremely effective for "gettin love" from the
other gender? As far as I know, he only makes SOE which has a 4:1 nol:rone ratio.
Thanks in advance for your
thoughts/guidance.
shawnk3,
yes, there is a lot of info on the pherolibrary, but thats a good thing.
hopefully it can answer any questions you have. just try to get as much info as possible to get the best results
from your pheromones.
androstenol increases LH in females which leads to a boost in testosterone, is a unisex
pheromone and creates social chattiness, but later converts to androstenone (the male sex pheromone) on the skin
over time.
androstenone is a masculine pheromone that gives respect, trust, and can give the alpha male provider
type feeling to a woman.
JVKohl didnt incorporate the androstenone in SOE bc Anone smells bad and androstenol
later converts to the more potent androstenone, as stated above.:thumbsup:
good luck :cheers:
terry0400-40
01-01-2009, 01:51 AM
Hi
guys-- I tried reading through the research subsection of the forum but it's very dry and has not been updated in
quite some time.
If any of the long-time veterans (Terry :) or idesign?) feel like they have a pretty good
handle on the research that's come out on mones, could you please post a summary?
My understanding (from
limited reading) is that:
-none produced changes in women's chemical levels.
-nol actually led females to
RATE pictures of males (and the males themselves) as more attractive and date-able than if the females were not
exposed to mones.
-rone...I'm not sure about.
Also, I was thinking that since JVKohl (the inventor of SOE)
is one of the foremost researchers in the field of mones, would he not have created a none-heavy or rone-heavy
product if he felt that either of them were extremely effective for "gettin love" from the other gender? As far as I
know, he only makes SOE which has a 4:1 nol:rone ratio.
Thanks in advance for your
thoughts/guidance.Ive got a minute.
If i remember then JV did not
rate Androstenone as one of his favourites.
Maby because Androstenol and Androsterone are
softer friendly pheromones where as Androstenone has less of a window of success, not that it is inferior as an
attraction agent if it is understood and used in correct context.
There is just less chance of having a run of OD's when using the softer pheromones, even when used
by less pheromone experienced users ect.
Androsterone is used to
give androstenone a softer image and thus make the wearer more approachable and seem less threatening ect,
And it is added to Alpha /androstenol to lessen its sometimes
overtly gregarious nature and to add an aura of dignity to the wearer so as to garner some respect.
Where some users get hits with aNONE others will sometimes get
very little, and prefere the Alpha/Betanols ect
And there others
who can not go a day without their fav androsterone products ie Alpha A314 which is predominantly Rone and probably
around 20% nols.
Sometimes we collectively as forum members can
guide a new pheromone user to finding their sweet spot with product that may suit their pheromone profile, And
usually if enough experimentation is put in then success follows and the Pheromone are then highly regarded by the
user.
Many users will have an idea of what may suit them after
using the Search feature on the forum and may very rapidly achieve pheromone
success.
crashbandicoot
01-01-2009, 01:56 AM
spot on about the
dignity, while wearing androsterone I am commented on being patient and scholarly. whats the dealeeyo?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.