View Full Version : Super Tuesday
idesign
02-06-2008, 04:30 PM
looks like Obama and Clinton will be fighting it out till the end which will ultimately
hurt their fundraising efforts for the Presidential election.
I don't think McCain's win will last long,
expect him to be "swiftboated" strongly and deservedly. The Christian Right can't stand him, Rush Limbaugh hates
him, lots of his fellow Republicans are wary of him. Huckabee did surprisingly well, now it remains to see if he can
get some more money. Ron Paul did poorly but will continue on till the money runs out and it may not run out. Mitt
Romney may be able to win. Although I really want Ron Paul, I could, just barely, stomach Obama or
Romney.
Good analysis of the Dem results KK. Its a horse race, and just today Hillary had to loan her
campaign $5M. Obama has raised more than twice what she has. What's interesting now is whether something will
happen to upset the deadlock, or will they go to the convention and put on a show. Anything can happen.
I can
neither agree or disagree on the GOP side. McCain is pretty clean... for a politician, and it would be pretty
ballsy for someone to throw dirt at an ex-POW. Unless it real dirt, and not pretend dirt, which doesn't
matter.
As for talk radio... its interesting that McCain did so well even after a lot of bad press from the
radio folks. Their influence may not be as broad or deep as many thought.
Yes, Huckabee did do surprisingly
well, and Romney must be disappointed. IMHO, Romney should drop out soon, very soon. He is not getting Southern
votes or moderate votes, he can't win.
Ron Paul would be a beneficial addition to the campaign if, and only if,
his voice was heard beyond the internet. His platform should be an important part of the debate, but he can't seem
to get it out past the cult following.
koolking1
02-06-2008, 06:02 PM
"Ron Paul would be a
beneficial addition to the campaign if, and only if, his voice was heard beyond the internet. His platform should be
an important part of the debate, but he can't seem to get it out past the cult following."
I couldn't agree
more. Here's why. I campaigned for him here in NH. Concord, the capital, has 3 times the population we have here
in Exeter. RP got 167 votes here in Exeter with just 3 campaign volunteers and he got 601 votes in Concord with
likely 1000 campaign volunteers, most from out of state. So, if 3 volunteers can get 167 votes, multiply that by
3xpopulation = 501 votes. So, with an additional 997 campaign volunteers you get an extra 100 votes. Ron Paul
voters are already committed and you can't change the minds of the other voters, they are too tuned into mainstream
politics. Plus, his organization is lousy, lousy, lousy.
There's a possibility McCain would offer Huckabee
VP to gain the Religious Right which can't get on his own. But, real conservatives can't stand either of them.
Clinton wins.
idesign
02-06-2008, 06:47 PM
There's a possibility McCain would offer Huckabee VP to gain the Religious Right which
can't get on his own. But, real conservatives can't stand either of them. Clinton wins.
I agree,
neither of them capture the Republican message, and its not just the far right. There are many issues, as you know,
that conservatives of all stripes look for in a candidate.
McCain is weak in the GOP, but not nationally in a
general election, particularly against Hillary. I would worry about McCain v Obama. As empty as Obama is, he has
the super-model mystique.
Obama is a total freak. He's done nothing... absolutely nothing. Can you say no
resume? And based on style and delivery he's some kind of hero. You can tell that Hillary is frustrated, even
though she's equally non-accomplished.
I disagree with you that Hillary will win against McCain. As big a
milk-toast as McCain is, Hillary will just not be elected.
tounge
02-06-2008, 08:36 PM
Huckabee and Romney take votes away
from each other,allowing the chameleon to pull ahead. If Rudi would have stayed in he would syphon off from McCain.
I'm a conspiracy theorist. The table is being set for the Wicked Witch to assume the Presidency and continue
with the destruction of the U.S. from within.:rasp:
koolking1
02-07-2008, 05:52 AM
"I'm a conspiracy
theorist. The table is being set for the Wicked Witch to assume the Presidency and continue with the destruction of
the U.S. from within."
I agree on that.
And why on earth would we here in the USA go for a Royal
Family thing?
The Republican Party is fractured into 3 wings now. Bush destroyed it. Ron Paul can bury it
with a 3rd Party candicacy. The Democrats have two wings now, anti-war and mommy-state. So what do we
have:
Traditional Republican (Romney)
Populist Republican (Huckabee)
NeoCon Republican
(McCain)
Anti-War Democrat (Obama)
Mommy-State Democrat (Clinton)
A 3rd Party candidate such as Paul
could win with 2/5 of the above voting for him.
I'm a big fan of Justin Raimondo of Anti-War.Com and get a
lot of my info/ideas from him.
Ron Paul needs to get moving and soon. He needs to let the voters know who
he would have in his Goverment, people like Judge Andrew Napolitano of Fox News fame might be good. He's
charismatic and his ideology is similar to Paul's.
I'll hope for the best but am really thinking like
Tounge that it's all pre-ordained and we have no real say in the matter.
koolking1
02-07-2008, 06:53 AM
"I can neither agree
or disagree on the GOP side. McCain is pretty clean... for a politician, and it would be pretty ballsy for someone
to throw dirt at an ex-POW. Unless it real dirt, and not pretend dirt, which doesn't matter."
Under the
strictest reading of the Constitution of the United States, McCain, having been born abroad, isn't even eligible to
be President. I've always chafed at that since two of my own children were born abroad, like McCain, of a US
military parent. But, we little people were always told that, "your kid can't be President under the
law".
McCain, prior to being shot down over North Vietnam, was involved in a major accident aboard a carrier
that resulted in the loss of life of at least one other pilot and the destruction of 5 fighter aircraft. The
accident was a foolish one and need not have happened if proper procedures had been followed (they weren't).
McCain's Admiral father got him out of that jam. If something like that happened to other fighter pilots, they
would have been drummed out.
Just being shot down is looked upon by fellow fighter pilots as a sign of
incompetence, perhaps unfair but true.
As far as I know, McCain, unlike some other very heroic POWs, never
made an escape attempt. One can look at the web site http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/
and see that there is some measure of dislike towards him. I won't go into details but most former POWs have some
mental health issues that are certainly not their fault but nonetheless they do exist. Due to his past history
McCain, and I will point out too that George Bush Jr has the same dilemna, would likely not pass the same stringent
standards we expect of an 18 year old GI who simply guards airplanes or storage depots where nukes are in play (drug
or alcohol abuse is enough to suspend your nuclear weapons credentials temporarily but it will be permanent if the
alcohol abuse doesn't get cured (and fast) or if it involved drugs such as LSD, heroin, or cocaine). However, I
would think that McCain would have an easier time than Bush of being certified for nuclear weapons after a
psychiatric evaluation. I couldn't be certified today either as I smoke weed.
POW's weren't exactly
trusted by their service branches (mainly Air Force and Navy) after they got back home. For their sacrifice though,
they were assigned to very plush jobs that were out of the mainstream of combat ops until they were eligible to
retire. Fair, not fair, who knows.
I don't think I'm slinging mud here but just presenting some thoughts
that people thinking of voting for McCain might consider. It's too bad the US government back then didn't
EFFECTIVELY pressure the North Vietnamese to release them within days of capture. I wholeheartedly think John
McCain is a hero. It's not for his POW days that I won't vote for him. It's that he's aligned himself with the
neocons and for other reasons.
koolking1
02-07-2008, 09:48 AM
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2008/020708_never_tortured.htm
HRC won't have to
bring it up, others will for her or not I've no idea.
koolking1
02-07-2008, 10:00 AM
http://bigheaddc.com/2007/10/31/cindy-mccain-bush-spread-rumors-that-john-fathered-black-child-out-of-wedlock/
This is old news but what I find interesting is that Mrs McCain was addicted to pain killers. What
would you do if you were her husband?
Mtnjim
02-07-2008, 10:47 AM
McCain,
prior to being shot down over North Vietnam, was involved in a major accident aboard a carrier that resulted in the
loss of life of at least one other pilot and the destruction of 5 fighter aircraft. The accident was a foolish one
and need not have happened if proper procedures had been followed (they weren't). McCain's Admiral father got him
out of that jam. If something like that happened to other fighter pilots, they would have been drummed
out.
Actually, He was preparing to launch off the Forrestal and another pilot fired a missile into
his plane. He barely got out of his plane. The ship burned for several days. Later he was shot down. In reality,
somebody "up there" doesn't like him, he should be dead.
Mtnjim
02-07-2008, 11:37 AM
...IMHO,
Romney should drop out soon...
Looks like you called it. I just heard he has suspended his campaign.
koolking1
02-07-2008, 01:02 PM
now it's getting
interesting. Romney apparently can hold onto his delegates as he's suspended and not ended his campaign, wonder
what he wants for his leverage?
So, that leaves McCain, Huckabee, and Paul. Something tells me there
will be no more Republican debates now. McCain would be made to look foolish now that he doesn't have Romney to
quarrel with. He'd have to really debate Paul and Huckabee and I'm sure he'd lose badly. The MSM could say that
there's only one viable candidate so no need for further debates. I hope that's not the case but suspect it is.
Jim, I took a look at the Wikipedia entry for McCain and the USS Forrestal:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1967_USS_Forrestal_fire
I think there's much more to that than what
Wikipedia is saying. I recall things like McCain and his fellow pilots engaging in some dangerous behavior
(something akin to "popping the clutch") that was considered hot-doggin it and against regulations. And, the 1000
lb bombs were not from the Korean War but from the mid-30s and known to be highly unstable. I'll have to do some
further digging.
idesign
02-08-2008, 06:12 PM
Interesting comments
guys...
I see Huckabee as the great unknown at this point. If he drops out there will be a GOP candidate in an
instant. If he hangs on (stupidly) he will make as big a mess as the Dems have going on. He will not gain much, if
any from Romney's departure, and he cannot win. Republicans don't have "super delegates", and I think neither
Romney nor Huckabee have sufficient delegates to broker any deal. That may be Romney's play to force Huckabee out:
"suspend" your candidacy instead of dropping out completely.
We'll see how Huckabee reacts to his almost
certain loss in VA. Its a key state... southern and somewhat conservative, but the No.Va. liberal bent may overcome
for McCain.
At this point I think the fractured GOP needs to cut its losses and get behind the compromise
candidate... McCain. He's a big compromise to be sure, and its truly a shame that some of the other candidates
bungled their campaigns.
Now that ST is over and the Dem candidates are in a horse race, I see a catfight until
some major event kicks one of them to the curb. Barring that, their super delegates will get behind Hillary when
crunch time comes, and will give her the nomination.
The Dem situation is so surreal. Hillary is the
establishment candidate but even her own party knows that she's a socialist bitch tyrant, and I doubt that many
like her, even Bill, as history has proven. :)
Obama is ideologically the same person in black-male clothing.
But his persona is diametrically opposed. He's painting a much prettier picture of social/fiscal rape than
Hillary's technical ugliness.
All rhetoric, no substance, flashy-empty promises which promise nothing but big
programs and big taxes. A melting pocket watch against a stark landscape.
koolking1
02-09-2008, 05:49 AM
folks are starting to
question the legality of McCain running for President, he's not eligible to be President due to being born outside
the United States.
Paul says he'll continue to run but has cut top staff and will, for now, campaign
heartily for his Texas Congressional seat and is asking for money for that venture. He has lost some supporters
mainly due to his not taking a stance over a recount of the NH vote. Ron Paul maintained all along that it wasn't
about himself but about Freedom and many of his supporters understood that and took it to heart. Too bad Ron Paul
didn't.
A recent study has shown that the length of time in place coupled with the same faces, the House
and Senate are substantially on par with the old Soviet Politburo.
The folks who have always wanted a real
ruler, a Royal Family, have gotten their wish. All Hail the Queen!!!
idesign
02-10-2008, 05:24 PM
This one's for you KK...
:)
New York, NY (AP) Ann Coulter, political commentator and best-selling author, collapsed shortly after
completing a Fox News interview where she vowed to go on a hunger strike until Ron Paul dropped out of the
Republican primary.
A spokesman promised further details as they became available but would only comment, "I
don't think Ann would have wanted us to think that her untimely death was related to Ron Paul's astounding results
in Iowa. She never was much on eating anyway."
A Fox News spokesperson declined to comment on Coulter's
collapse, but did say that their decision to exclude Ron Paul from an upcoming televised forum was final, regardless
of any "allegedly official results" from Iowa.
Reaction to Paul's strong showing in Iowa was significant, but
somewhat less severe among other prominent political pundits:
* Bill O'Reilly's entire Talking Points Memo
consisted of a single graphic of a Zogby Poll taken in June 2007 in the background, while O'Reilly placed fingers
in both ears and repeated, "I can't hear you, I can't hear you" for six minutes.
* The three major
networks canceled all Sunday political programming after several talking heads exploded during live coverage of the
Iowa Caucuses.
* Missing for hours, Sean Hannity was finally found under his desk at FoxNews HQ, curled
into a fetal position and whispering to himself, "He's NOT a Great American, He's NOT a Great American..."
* An inside source at the EIB network who identified himself only as "Snerdly" confirmed that Rush Limbaugh had
finally Googled Ron Paul.
http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i28448
koolking1
02-13-2008, 08:05 AM
So now what do we have?
Obama and McCain are the front-runners. I think the Republicans now realize they've made a big mistake in not
listening to Ron Paul. From some polling data nearly half of the Republican faithful can't stomach McCain and will
either sit out the general election, vote for Huckabee or, God forbid, switch parties and vote for Obama (they would
never vote for HRC though). Some consensus is that the country is going to be so screwed up by October anyway that
the best bet is to hand it over to Obama and pick up the pieces in 2012. But, there's still a long way to go till
the conventions. Paul wants to have a big demonstration in DC in the next 3-4 months, that could help but I doubt
it now (upon initially hearing that idea I thought, might work, with more thought though now I don't think it
will). I'll maintain that McCain can beat neither HRC or Obama.
idesign
02-13-2008, 03:23 PM
Yep, I see Obama and McCain,
Huckabee's days are numbered and now its only vanity that keeps him in the race, maybe setting himself up for 2012.
He's becoming an embarrassment.
For the Dems.... I don't discount the Clintons, but, BUT, I think even their
faithful are finally getting a clue on their brand of "leadership". I'm still amazed though that Obama has come
this far. He really and truly is, like tongue said, "an empty suit". He's a super-model on the cover of Time
instead of Sports Illustrated, and similarly qualified. But like you said, there's a long way to go.
I hope
you're right about McCain beating Obama. This guy scares me for one reason: voters are increasingly being
dumbed-down. Between the empty debates and the idiotic media there is no real discussion going on about the issues
and their importance. Obama is running on "change", and it strikes a deep chord in America these days, for good
reason. But the change that Obama has in mind is idiotic and sometimes even dangerous. A population which is
uncritical of the candidates - and their so called ideas - could very well vote for someone like Obama. It would be
like choosing a 1st year Med student to do brain surgery; you end up with a lobotomy.
koolking1
02-13-2008, 03:30 PM
you misread me on that
one. McCain cannot win against either Obama or Clinton, bank on that. McCain has only half of his own party behind
him and I doubt they'll rally behind him as the campaign heats up. I think they want the Dems to win rather than
their own guy. And, rumor has it that Ron Paul and Edwards supporters will end up in the Obama camp. Both of those
groups detest HRC.
idesign
02-13-2008, 04:45 PM
you
misread me on that one. McCain cannot win against either Obama or Clinton, bank on that. McCain has only half of
his own party behind him and I doubt they'll rally behind him as the campaign heats up. I think they want the Dems
to win rather than their own guy. And, rumor has it that Ron Paul and Edwards supporters will end up in the Obama
camp. Both of those groups detest HRC.
Yes I did misread you, but I hope you're wrong. I don't worry
about Hillary. Once the primaries are over the dynamics will change, and we'll see how McCain v. Obama starts to
play out.
I also hope that Paul learns from his mistakes. We really need an alternative voice. Even if he's
not viable, we need his ideas fully heard in the marketplace.
belgareth
02-13-2008, 05:09 PM
Unfortunately, it has
definately become another election where most people are looking at the lesser of evils. Neither major party
candidate is worth voting for, as usual.
koolking1
02-14-2008, 03:43 PM
"I also hope that Paul
learns from his mistakes. We really need an alternative voice. Even if he's not viable, we need his ideas fully
heard in the marketplace."
Or, better, if his campaign staff have learned from their mistakes and foolish
spending of all the money that was raised. I'm not counting him out yet, nor Huckabee who's becoming a real thorn
in McCain's side. Anyway, as of today it's down to 5 with Romney conceding to McCain and backing
him.
Obama
Clinton
McCain
Huckabee
Paul
Bush said yesterday that the economy is fine
and good for clear sailing through 2008. Bernanke today says it's not looking good at all, who to believe?
" Doris Lessing, who won the 2007 Nobel Literature Prize, says that Obama will be assasinated if he wins" -
source: Huffington Post
I had some measure of respect for Romney but that's gone as of today. The only way
Ron Paul can still win is if Huckabee stays in the race which will force the news channels to have more debates.
The Republican party has to realize that Paul is the only true Republican running.
koolking1
02-15-2008, 08:53 AM
to torture
now, hope this hurts his campaign significantly. Perhaps he's never been tortured himself, has me wondering now.
Lieberman says it's ok too.
idesign
02-15-2008, 04:04 PM
That reminds me, I've been
thinking about running mates. Look for a McCain/Lieberman ticket this fall.
idesign
02-22-2008, 09:13 PM
McCain is
pretty clean... for a politician, and it would be pretty ballsy for someone to throw dirt at an ex-POW. Unless it
real dirt, and not pretend dirt, which doesn't matter.
And the "pretend dirt" has flown from the NY
Times. Seems McCain is the beneficiary in the empty "lobbyist sex relationship favor scandal'. I love this
stuff.
C'mon... the Times has been digging its own grave for years, this is just another example. What were
they thinking?
Perhaps they were (not) thinking the same way as Dan Rather when he "broke" the Bush Nat'l Guard
"story". The mainstream press still thinks it has the respect of thinking people. How wrong can they be before it
becomes delusional?
Unfortunately you can't fire a newspaper. What a joke they've become.
Methinks I rant
too much, sorry.
tounge
02-22-2008, 09:25 PM
That reminds
me, I've been thinking about running mates. Look for a McCain/Lieberman ticket this fall.
Not gonna happen. If it did, he's done.
The old fart has a good chance to win because Obama is going to be
unelectable. I still have a feeling the Wicked Witch may still get the dem nod.
tounge
02-22-2008, 09:31 PM
And the
"pretend dirt" has flown from the NY Times. Seems McCain is the beneficiary in the empty "lobbyist sex relationship
favor scandal'. I love this stuff.
C'mon... the Times has been digging its own grave for years, this is just
another example. What were they thinking?
Perhaps they were (not) thinking the same way as Dan Rather when he
"broke" the Bush Nat'l Guard "story". The mainstream press still thinks it has the respect of thinking people. How
wrong can they be before it becomes delusional?
Unfortunately you can't fire a newspaper. What a joke they've
become.
Methinks I rant too much, sorry.
The NYT is as relevant as the National Enquirer.
The whole leftist media which is the main stream media in the US, is constantly showing its stupidity among its
arrogance. Most clear thinking people have ignored the leftist media crap for the last decade.
tounge
02-22-2008, 09:45 PM
Hey Oly Sheet, the ID man is a
Moderator!:box: :box: :box:
idesign
02-22-2008, 10:16 PM
Hey Oly
Sheet, the ID man is a Moderator!:box: :box: :box:
still a working man Bro, still learning. :cheers:
Mtnjim
02-25-2008, 10:29 AM
...The whole
leftist media which is the main stream media in the US, is constantly showing its stupidity among its arrogance.
Most clear thinking people have ignored the leftist media crap for the last decade.
The "leftist liberal
media" thing is, and has been an urban myth. Most of the media is owned by right wing Republicans, I mean, Rupert
Murdoch a liberal? come on!!
koolking1
02-25-2008, 10:38 AM
with the Mountain Man.
Actually, I don't think anyone anymore knows what is what regarding the MSM. I notice they don't report on Kosovo
during the evening news and there's a lot happening there. It seems there's more "news" about health issues and
movie stars than anything else. BBC America is pretty good though.
Mtnjim
02-25-2008, 11:15 AM
...BBC
America is pretty good though.
Agreed, 7:00 PM every night!
koolking1
02-25-2008, 11:20 AM
our time differences, 10PM
here
tounge
02-25-2008, 11:32 AM
I notice
they don't report on Kosovo during the evening news and there's a lot happening there.
Of
course not. Wouldn't want to highlight Bill Clinton's unjust little war. And of course the chickens are coming
home to roost in that part of the world. The radicals that are going to run Kosovo are going to be a major problem
in the heart of Europe.
koolking1
02-25-2008, 11:34 AM
were just radicals,
they are the criminal class.
tounge
02-25-2008, 11:35 AM
The "leftist
liberal media" thing is, and has been an urban myth. Most of the media is owned by right wing Republicans, I mean,
Rupert Murdoch a liberal? come on!!
Ha. LOL I guess I shouldnt believe my lying ears and eyes. It's no
urban myth, and the NYT's latest shenanigans point this out once again.
Ruport Murdoch? Have you checked where
he has donated money to lately?
idesign
02-26-2008, 07:20 PM
The
"leftist liberal media" thing is, and has been an urban myth. Most of the media is owned by right wing Republicans,
I mean, Rupert Murdoch a liberal? come on!!
With all due respect Jim, I think that your statement is
wrong. Murdoch is indeed the owner of the parent company of Fox Broadcasting, which some accuse of being "Right
leaning", but have a look at who owns and/or has editorial control over other media outlets, both TV and print, and
I think you'll see a different story.
idesign
02-26-2008, 07:25 PM
Ruport
Murdoch? Have you checked where he has donated money to lately?
Its very common for any influential
organization or wealthy person to donate money to both sides of any political contest. You know this
tongue...
Unless you're G.Soros. :)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.