View Full Version : Pheromone Feedback & Testosterone
Mungojerry
12-24-2006, 05:28 PM
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
bronzie
12-24-2006, 05:51 PM
Obviously pheromones do have
some impact on hormone levels and do effect our physiology first and foremost before they effect our physology, yes
this has been raised in the past, and some members have even gone as far as saying because of the nature of the
product (unregulated/untested) we could be doing untold and unknown things to our physiology, both in the short and
long term. For me, this is a concern. I know some members use pheromones on a daily basis, some even feel "naked" or
"incomplete" when not using them. Others may attribute this to physology, however there may be physiological reasons
for this, a kind of addiction if you will.
I personally do not use pheromones on a daily basis for this
reason. I mainly use them on a first or second date, to hook the girl, after that, I let what nature intended.
bronzie
12-24-2006, 05:57 PM
By the way, I know your question
was in regards to testosterone levels and effects, but I think that is one small facet in the bigger
picture.
Jvkhol might be better able to answer...
Mungojerry
12-24-2006, 05:59 PM
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Icehawk
12-25-2006, 07:15 AM
Yeah it works that way. First
off some mone called pregna-4,20-diene-3,6-dione (PDD) lowered LH and test levels in males amongst other things.
Second off some males react poorly to none and A1 so it obviously has some negative hormonal effect on them. As for
supressing phero levels, I think modern hygene has way more effect than mones.
Mungojerry
01-01-2007, 05:23 PM
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
jvkohl
01-01-2007, 06:40 PM
First off some mone
called pregna-4,20-diene-3,6-dione (PDD) lowered LH and test levels in males amongst other things.
This compound was described to me by Clive Jennings-White (chemist for Erox/Pherin/HPS) as a progesteronic
pheromone. Progesterone is high during pregnancy and at the time a woman has her period. Lower LH and T would be the
likely result of a signal saying "find someone else; you cannot get me pregnant," while the ovulatory phase
estrogenic pheromones (copulins) signal "come and get me pregnant" by raising LH and testosterone. This is basically
what happens in other mammals to ensure what's called "properly timed reproductive sexual behavior."
Second off some males react poorly to none and A1 so it obviously has some negative hormonal
effect on them. As for supressing phero levels, I think modern hygene has way more effect than
mones.
-------------------------------------------------------------
The following is pure
speculation--supported by animal research but not by human
studies.
-------------------------------------------------------------
If male pheromone enhancement
causes a decline in LH and testosterone in other males, it is not merely a function of the pheromone--it is the
combination of their own associations with dominant males (at least, in theory). If they tend to come up the loser,
we can expect a decline in testosterone levels will accompany the expectation (so they're less likely to put up a
fight--again, from an animalistic approach). But male pheromone enhancement effects on the wearer should not have
the same effect as extra pheromones have on another male. Indeed, they might have the opposite effect, making him
unconsciously aware that he is the dominant male--perhaps even increasing his testosterone
levels.
----------------------------------------------------
Berliner, D.L., Monti-Bloch, L.,
Jennings-White, C., & Diaz-Sanchez, V. (1996) Functionality of the human vomeronasal organ (VNO): Evidence for
steroid receptors. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 58, 3, 259-265.
The citation above
is where the authors say that the progesteronic pheromone lowered testosterone. The question that remains is why
they never tested androstadienone to see if it raised testosterone (or did they?).
JVK
Mungojerry
01-01-2007, 06:49 PM
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
WorkingMann
01-01-2007, 09:00 PM
This compound
was described to me by Clive Jennings-White (chemist for Erox/Pherin/HPS) as a progesteronic pheromone. Progesterone
is high during pregnancy and at the time a woman has her period. Lower LH and T would be the likely result of a
signal saying "find someone else; you cannot get me pregnant," while the ovulatory phase estrogenic pheromones
(copulins) signal "come and get me pregnant" by raising LH and testosterone. This is basically what happens in other
mammals to ensure what's called "properly timed reproductive sexual behavior."
-------------------------------------------------------------
The following is pure speculation--supported
by animal research but not by human studies.
-------------------------------------------------------------
If
male pheromone enhancement causes a decline in LH and testosterone in other males, it is not merely a function of
the pheromone--it is the combination of their own associations with dominant males (at least, in theory). If they
tend to come up the loser, we can expect a decline in testosterone levels will accompany the expectation (so
they're less likely to put up a fight--again, from an animalistic approach). But male pheromone enhancement effects
on the wearer should not have the same effect as extra pheromones have on another male. Indeed, they might have the
opposite effect, making him unconsciously aware that he is the dominant male--perhaps even increasing his
testosterone levels.
----------------------------------------------------
Berliner, D.L., Monti-Bloch, L.,
Jennings-White, C., & Diaz-Sanchez, V. (1996) Functionality of the human vomeronasal organ (VNO): Evidence for
steroid receptors. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 58, 3, 259-265.
The citation above is
where the authors say that the progesteronic pheromone lowered testosterone. The question that remains is why they
never tested androstadienone to see if it raised testosterone (or did they?).
JVK
(http://)
Does this mean that if this animal
thing should be the same for us then..
When we apply the pheroes out body thinks there a more dominant male around
us (and that's the pheroes) and it stops producing so much testosterone..? Or am I reading this the wrong
way?
:LOL:
Mungojerry
01-02-2007, 06:40 AM
cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
Marlboro_man
01-02-2007, 08:01 PM
No your
brain detects the stuff is coming from you, assumes you are the dominant male, therefore could potentially
increase your testosterone levels.
I can say that I definitely have an increased sex drive when wearing
NPA, so it must increase my own levels.
WorkingMann
01-03-2007, 07:54 AM
Yes but in theory..
How can
our brain know it's our own and not becuase we smell some elses testosterone..?
Icehawk
01-03-2007, 11:21 AM
Yes but in
theory..
How can our brain know it's our own and not becuase we smell some elses
testosterone..?
Look up anchoring. Your brain does it all the time. Plus the vaious studies on human
ability to follow scent to its source.
WorkingMann
01-03-2007, 11:56 AM
Okay so it' really
possible.. Just can't see how but I might have to check that sometime..
quaxer
01-04-2007, 09:32 AM
Isnt
it possible, that in such a situation our body on the contrary produces more testosterone / pheromones to enhance
competitiveness ?
That was my first assumption when I noticed that on pheromone application body odor and sperm
volume seemed to increase .....
jvkohl
01-04-2007, 10:16 AM
Isnt it possible,
that in such a situation our body on the contrary produces more testosterone / pheromones to enhance
competitiveness?
Yes. Here's the link to one of several articles that JM Dabbs Jr has authored or
co-authored.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list
_uids=9811365&query_hl=1&itool=pubmed_docsum
Currently, integrating his (and others') findings with
effects of pheromones on hormones in other animals and in humans, allows for speculation that "winners" and "losers"
of competition respond with changes in testosterone that would be reflected in their production of masculine
pheromones. As I recall, someone even reported that chess competition resulted in increased testosterone in the
winner, and decreased testosterone in the loser.
JVK
WorkingMann
01-04-2007, 05:19 PM
Yes. Here's
the link to one of several articles that JM Dabbs Jr has authored or
co-authored.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt
=AbstractPlus&list_uids=9811365&query_hl=1&itool=pubmed_docsum (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_ui
ds=9811365&query_hl=1&itool=pubmed_docsum)
Currently, integrating his (and others')
findings with effects of pheromones on hormones in other animals and in humans, allows for speculation that
"winners" and "losers" of competition respond with changes in testosterone that would be reflected in their
production of masculine pheromones. As I recall, someone even reported that chess competition resulted in increased
testosterone in the winner, and decreased testosterone in the
loser.
JVK
(http://)
But wouldn't that be the same
for males around us?
When I wear pheroes their production of testosterone should increase because of their enhanced
competitiveness..?
:blink:
jvkohl
01-04-2007, 06:22 PM
But wouldn't
that be the same for males around us?
When I wear pheroes their production of testosterone should increase
because of their enhanced competitiveness..?
:blink:
It would most likely depend on their
perception of whether or not they are the dominant male (e.g., the likely winner of competition). If, therefore,
pheromone-enhancement provides you with the benefit of thinking you will be the likely winner, in theory, your
testosterone level would be likely to rise; his would be more likely to
fall.
JVK
WorkingMann
01-05-2007, 05:24 AM
It would most
likely depend on their perception of whether or not they are the dominant male (e.g., the likely winner of
competition). If, therefore, pheromone-enhancement provides you with the benefit of thinking you will be the likely
winner, in theory, your testosterone level would be likely to rise; his would be more likely to
fall.
JVK
(http://)
That also seems fair.. In animal
kingdom some males will try to take the "trone" and others will bow in the dust..
And also one of my friends have
had some time where he was very negative towards me and he kindda plays the boss for some reason.. I think he wants
to be the one everyone looks up to but he can't handle the pressure.. And then he blaimed me for everything and
yelled a lot.. This can be because he was threatened by me, because I started using more powerfull mones at that
time.. And he also have a thing for a girl that maybe likes me and he's a bit angry about it I think.. He's
doesn't do anything to get her, and kindda stand off (maybe because he thinks I'm the dominant male and therefor I
have the right to her) and he thinks she likes me bettter than him (she's just a friend to me so far) and perhaps
because he thinks I'm the dominant male he therefor unconsiusly thinks she likes me better because I'm the
dominant male..
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.