belgareth
09-12-2006, 07:09 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20060912/ts_csm/oafterpi
llx (http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20060912/ts_csm/oafterpillx)
What do you folks think?
Personally, I'm all for it. There's few things worse than babies
having babies and if that's what it takes to prevent these children from trying to raise children themselves, so be
it. The church is complaining that its vieled abortion and is wrong. Some political groups claim it is taking away
the parents' rights.
In the case of the church...So? Is the church able to prevent these pregnancies or take
care of the unwanted babies? If not, which is the case, then the church is out of line trying to prevent it.
In
the case of the parents, where are they when these kids are getting pregnant? Apparently they haven't been doing
their job protecting the kids by educating them. Why should their rights supercede the kids' rights?
llx (http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20060912/ts_csm/oafterpillx)
What do you folks think?
Personally, I'm all for it. There's few things worse than babies
having babies and if that's what it takes to prevent these children from trying to raise children themselves, so be
it. The church is complaining that its vieled abortion and is wrong. Some political groups claim it is taking away
the parents' rights.
In the case of the church...So? Is the church able to prevent these pregnancies or take
care of the unwanted babies? If not, which is the case, then the church is out of line trying to prevent it.
In
the case of the parents, where are they when these kids are getting pregnant? Apparently they haven't been doing
their job protecting the kids by educating them. Why should their rights supercede the kids' rights?