View Full Version : Is ther a difference between hitting on a chic vs. "seducing" a chic?
happyman
03-17-2006, 01:52 AM
I asked this in another thread but didn't get an answer. My question
is:
Is there a difference between actually "seducing" a woman verses hitting on them? I thought they were kinda
the same....at least at the start.
I suppose there may be? I never knew there was a difference. I thought
they all entailed the same elements. But am I getting the idea they are two entiely different approaches and
techniques? I never, and still don't, know how to seduce. I just try and get a conversation started, play around
and flirt a little, talk, ask questions, and throw in some humor, and some flirting and if she is into it, I guess
shoot for her number or ask to go somewhere or something along that approach method. I just have fun with it in that
aspect of approaching, with out seeming like you know, it is too rehearsed, if I can help it. This is kinda how I
have always done it. I just talk about what-ever. I never think to give hidden inuendo's or subliminal messages to
what I am saying.
Is there a big difference between hitting, and or flirting with a women by starting a
conversation with them vs. actually going for the seducing technique? and if so what is it? I didn't think there
was too much a difference.
Happy
phersurf
03-17-2006, 10:23 AM
There's a big
difference.
A seduction moves through very defined steps, although there are many different techniques to
acomplish them,
1. build attraction - you have to build attracation first before moving to the next
step
2. create comfort - if you try to create comfort before buildiong attraction, you will put yourself in
the LJBF zone!
3. build raport - finding similar interests, friends, philosophy, etc, if you do this too soon
you come off as being needy and trying to impress. "wow, you like movies! I like movies too! We have so much in
comon"
4. only now can you take it to a physical level
Once you get good at these steps, you can see
exactly the time she becomes attracted to you, when she starts to feel a connection to you and exactly when it's
time to go in for a kiss! Since I've gotten good at this, I've never been turned down for a kiss.
These
steps have been verified by scientists spending hours studying men and women interacting.
"Hitting on a
chick" has a conotation (at tleast to me) of just randomly sayng and doing things that may or may not have any
positive effects on attracting the woman. If she happens to find you attractive, or you're lucky enough not to do
anything dumb, you may get a date or a number. This is called "fool's mate" or "getting lucky". Then you have to
not do anything dumb on the intitial phone call and/or date (again, there's ways to increase the attraction on
dates so as not to get LJBF'd).
At first I had to think about these steps and what was working and what
wasn't all the time. Now that I've integrated it into my being, I can freeflow and move in and out of the various
steps at will, so it's not so rigid.
happyman
03-17-2006, 11:29 AM
There's a big
difference.
A seduction moves through very defined steps, although there are many different techniques to
acomplish them,
1. build attraction - you have to build attracation first before moving to the next
step
2. create comfort - if you try to create comfort before buildiong attraction, you will put yourself in
the LJBF zone!
3. build raport - finding similar interests, friends, philosophy, etc, if you do this too soon
you come off as being needy and trying to impress. "wow, you like movies! I like movies too! We have so much in
comon"
4. only now can you take it to a physical level
Once you get good at these steps, you can see
exactly the time she becomes attracted to you, when she starts to feel a connection to you and exactly when it's
time to go in for a kiss! Since I've gotten good at this, I've never been turned down for a kiss.
These
steps have been verified by scientists spending hours studying men and women interacting.
"Hitting on a
chick" has a conotation (at tleast to me) of just randomly sayng and doing things that may or may not have any
positive effects on attracting the woman. If she happens to find you attractive, or you're lucky enough not to do
anything dumb, you may get a date or a number. This is called "fool's mate" or "getting lucky". Then you have to
not do anything dumb on the intitial phone call and/or date (again, there's ways to increase the attraction on
dates so as not to get LJBF'd).
At first I had to think about these steps and what was working and what
wasn't all the time. Now that I've integrated it into my being, I can freeflow and move in and out of the various
steps at will, so it's not so
rigid.
__________________________________________________ ___________
Oh, I see. Those steps
make so much sense. That IS how it happens. Here is the only problem. I HAVE done those steps with a women before.
Several times. BUT I did them with out realizing what I was doing. I was just being me and those steps took their
own coarse of action. I have built attraction. That is easy. A women sees you, and you see them, and there is an
attraction. That occurs, for the most pat, mostly naturally. There are other things you can do? What are they
specifically?
Then when I get to step 2. It seems she becomes dis-interested. I notice this because this is
when I manually, consciously do it. If I stay on step one, she never changes....but neither does the situation. What
am I doing wrong?
Can you tell me when, or how to proceed to the next level?
Happyman
Gegogi
03-17-2006, 11:36 AM
Is ther a difference
between hitting on a chic vs. "seducing" a chic?
I'm guessing serious use of words like "chic" and "chick"
are one of reasons women make themselves scarce in this forum. Smacks of a boy's club and may be taken as
derogatory.
"Hitting on" is an attempt at making a connection. Seduction creates a state of mystery and desire
that leads to amorous activity between consenting parties.
Holmes
03-17-2006, 12:13 PM
If you're real good, you
can do both at the same time! :lol:
Does "chic" mean "French woman?"
happyman
03-17-2006, 12:28 PM
[QUOTE=Gegogi]I'm guessing
serious use of words like "chic" and "chick" are one of reasons women make themselves scarce in this forum. Smacks
of a boy's club and may be taken as derogatory.
"Hitting on" is an attempt at making a connection. Seduction
creates a state of mystery and desire that leads to amorous activity between consenting
parties.
__________________________________________________ ____________
Ok then. Female, Women,
Mrs..... I did not want to use female because that sounds too text book like. I did not want to use women because
some may think I am speaking of older women only and not the girls in their 20's. Lastly, I did not want to use the
term girls because it sounds too young.
Chick was a way for me to state in with-out being too serious
here.
What eles was there 'babe". That would be even more silly.
Lastly,
Women who come to a
mesage board seeing things like "got Laid by mones", or "Hit stories of 2006" got to know, and understand, things
are not so cold, and text book like here. If they, haven't figured that one out by now I don't know what to tell
you. It certainley wasn't meant as derogatory or meant to seem childish. I just didn't want to seem formal. What
is the difference between them calling us a "hunk" in the 80's to chic. I realize the 80's was a while ago...but.
Happy
Gegogi
03-17-2006, 04:45 PM
In the USA--and this varies in
different cultures--any female 18 and older is legally an adult, i.e., a woman. Under 18, she is considered a female
child and qualifies as a girl. Now most of the women I meet are 18-30 college students. The "older" women are
usually grad students in their mid 20s. If I referred to them as "chics" most would be displeased, maybe even kick
my ass (calling her a bitch is usually safer). If a man referred to woman as girl, that ain't fightin' words but
might mark you as having poor judgement or a low intelligence quotient. Treat her like a woman she will reward you
in-kind.
chicago
03-17-2006, 05:10 PM
sometimes it comes down to being
at the right place at the right time. with the females, lol
________
The
Cigar Boss (http://thecigarboss.com/)
InternationalPlayboy
03-17-2006, 05:11 PM
A particapant in a
now defunct forum I used to frequent would get offended if you called her a "lady." It was due to unresolved issues
with her mother, who would always tell her that "a lady doesn't do" such and such. She had no problem with the term
"broad" though.
Holmes
03-17-2006, 05:43 PM
A
particapant in a now defunct forum I used to frequent would get offended if you called her a "lady." It was due to
unresolved issues with her mother, who would always tell her that "a lady doesn't do" such and such. She had no
problem with the term "broad" though.
That's funny. Don't know if you saw 10, but there's a
classic argument between Dudley Moore and Julie Andrews over the meaning of the word "broad" (which she insisted was
the same as "hooker").
happyman
03-22-2006, 01:13 AM
I need help on this. In
Reference on the four steps to seduction that were mentioned in this post:
Here is the only problem. I HAVE
done those steps with a women before. Several times. BUT I did them with out realizing what I was doing. I was just
being me and those steps took their own coarse of action. I have built attraction. That is easy. A women sees you,
and you see them, and there is an attraction. That occurs, for the most pat, mostly naturally. There are other
things you can do? What are they specifically?
Then when I get to step 2. It seems she becomes
dis-interested. I notice this because this is when I manually, consciously do it. If I stay on step one, she never
changes....but neither does the situation. What am I doing wrong? Can anyone tell me what-up?
Happyman
CptKipling
03-22-2006, 05:13 AM
Your aren't building
attraction properly, or your transitional skills are poor, or she was only seeking the validation of your
attention.
My guess is the first one, because it isn't easy to go from attraction to disinterest unless you are
really awkward.
MOBLEYC57
03-22-2006, 05:14 AM
I need help on
this. In Reference on the four steps to seduction that were mentioned in this post:
Here is the only problem. I
HAVE done those steps with a women before. Several times. BUT I did them with out realizing what I was doing. I was
just being me and those steps took their own coarse of action. I have built attraction. That is easy. A women sees
you, and you see them, and there is an attraction. That occurs, for the most pat, mostly naturally. There are other
things you can do? What are they specifically?
Then when I get to step 2. It seems she becomes dis-interested. I
notice this because this is when I manually, consciously do it. If I stay on step one, she never changes....but
neither does the situation. What am I doing wrong? Can anyone tell me what-up?
Happyman
I'm
willing to bet you that YOUR step 2 shows you're from WUSSville, which is probably your problem! :trout:
And,
you are still playing games my friend, but I think you're beginning to see that, eh? :blink: You should also start
seeing that it's beginning to seem worth it, too! :trout: Or, just do without the company of a feline. :sick:
Annnnd, hitting vs seduction is just step 1, then step 2, no? :think: T'would be in my book. :blink: Anyone ever
seduce someone without hitting on them?:think:
phersurf
03-22-2006, 11:24 AM
Here is the only
problem. I HAVE done those steps with a women before. Several times. BUT I did them with out realizing what I was
doing. I was just being me and those steps took their own coarse of action. I have built attraction. That is easy. A
women sees you, and you see them, and there is an attraction. That occurs, for the most pat, mostly naturally.
Happyman
I'm not sure you really understand creating attraction.
She may see you and be
attracted to you physically, but if you act like a needy, wussy, suplicating guy, you'll kill any attraction you
had. Woman are intitially attracted by looks (but to nowhere near the extent as men), but if don't demonstrate the
right behaviors, your done.
Even if you have GQ looks but act like a wussy, you may get a one night stand,
but any hopes of anything more is out of the question.
If you act like she's the catch and your honored that
she's just is showing you attention, your done.
Attraction is created by demostrating that you're the
catch, that you have higher status than she does, that you're not affected by her beauty, and you can handle her
shit tests.
There's a famous PUA goes by the name David X that is a 55 year old, overweight, gruff talking,
construction worker that scores more hot women (short term and long term) than most 25 year old guys could ever hope
to. I've seen him appraoch a group of women and they actually have a look of disgust on their faces. An hour later
he is either making out with one of them or leaving with one of them.
CptKipling
03-22-2006, 12:52 PM
I'm willing
to be you that YOUR step 2 shows you're from WUSSville, which is probably your problem! :trout:
And, you are
still playing games my friend, but I think you're beginning to see that, eh? :blink:
lol yeah and
that.
happyman
03-22-2006, 06:32 PM
Wussy? Wussy? Wussy?
How
they hell can you judge me when you have never met me? I could be a 6 foot biker, alpha male that takes no
prisoners.
I am not really the aformentioned but I can ASSURE you all I was never a wussy or Too Needy. I am
as independent as they come brothers and sisters. I am in Los Angeles California and do not know a sould here in
town except for one person I am interning with. I moved out here all by my-self from across the country. Just came
from going to school in Arizona, by myself,. Intitially I moved from Ohio.....by myself! Let me put it this way, my
last girlfirend decided she wanted to see other guys. I tried to talk her out of that in ONE phone call that she
made to me. I loved the girl. Couldn't sleep at night thinking about her at times....but guess what, I let her call
me. I NEVER ran back to her, and even turned the tables by playing hard to get till she came back to me fully over
six long months of time.
There are some answers for you. I am not needy, or a wussy. Never have been. Anyone
who knows me would tell you the opposite.
My only problem was rolling along after step one and how. Moby
Dick or who-ever you are I can assure I can count. I had a problem getting to another level at times. "Wussy this,
Wussy that". What we are here for? To resolve and help the next person out? What sort of message board is this?
from: "not-real Happy" at the moment
belgareth
03-22-2006, 08:29 PM
Lighten up, Happyman. He meant
nothing by it. Fact is, if you say anything on a public forum you'd better be ready for a whole range of replies.
And the majority of them, if not all of them, will be dead wrong. Take what you think is worthwhile out of it and
ignore the rest. Starting a pissing contest isn't going to accomplish anything.
MOBLEYC57
03-22-2006, 08:37 PM
Lighten up,
Happyman. He meant nothing by it. Fact is, if you say anything on a public forum you'd better be ready for a
whole range of replies. And the majority of them, if not all of them, will be dead wrong. Take what you think is
worthwhile out of it and ignore the rest. Starting a pissing contest isn't going to accomplish anything.
Thanks, Bel! Right again! :wave:
I meant nothing by it, HM. No, I don't know you, but from this post and
another post you posted ... don't play games, it's not worth it" or something like that, I FIGURED (right or
wrong) you ARE having female issues, as we all do in some area or another. I just bet it's you.
It's a great
accomplishment that you've done everything by yourself, that's definitely something to be proud of ... I stay with
my mom! :frustrate
Step 2 is probably you're in such a hurry to conquer, and trust me, that shows in your
actions and words to any woman. You'll find that the only women that say they think you/she/we need to see other
people are bored/fed up. Annnnd, you said yourself ... you took her back after PLAYING hard to get, yes? :blink:
Tis an ugly thing being in love by yourself.:run:
Sorry I rattled your feathers ... seriously.:run:
Gegogi
03-22-2006, 09:36 PM
I'm just saying that in
the past (mine included) everytime some guy says, "I seem to be building attraction, yet I can't get anywhere",
their idea of building attraction is complimenting her on her beauty, asking her out in a way that telegraphs lower
status ("you wouldn't want to go out with me sometime, would you?" I shudder just writting those words), asking for
her phone number in the same wussy way, even approaching her incorrectly.
Funny you should mention these
things as women do them as well, although not nearly as much as men. My last two GFs, both attractive and smart,
sang that same tune. Although it certainly stroked my ego and gave me a brief illusion of power, I appreciated them
for the vulnerable position they put themselves in to get my attention. I really didn't think of them as wussies.
Instead, they were extremely brave to take the initiative and assume the risk of getting shot down.
Roles are
changing and women are very different than they were 25 years ago. With more women in college than men, especially
grad school, they'll be assuming positions of power in industry, art and politics, positions men won't be
qualified for. Women's social and sexual roles will surely follow suit and are already going that direction.
happyman
03-22-2006, 10:16 PM
Thanks, Bel!
Right again! :wave:
I meant nothing by it, HM. No, I don't know you, but from this post and another post
you posted ... don't play games, it's not worth it" or something like that, I FIGURED (right or wrong) you ARE
having female issues, as we all do in some area or another. I just bet it's you.
It's a great
accomplishment that you've done everything by yourself, that's definitely something to be proud of ... I stay with
my mom! :frustrate
Step 2 is probably you're in such a hurry to conquer, and trust me, that shows in your
actions and words to any woman. You'll find that the only women that say they think you/she/we need to see other
people are bored/fed up. Annnnd, you said yourself ... you took her back after PLAYING hard to get, yes? :blink:
Tis an ugly thing being in love by yourself.:run:
Sorry I rattled your feathers ...
seriously.:run:
__________________________________________________ ____________
Ok it's cool.
I didn't want to be a pee-on is all. Who you live with doesn't make you a wussy bro. It is how you handle life and
it's hurdles that truly makes a man a man. Not physical stregnth....but inner, and the ability to cope and deal
with life. That is being a man. Not saying you haven't done that, or anything just re-affirming what it seems like
we BOTH know by now.
Cheers,
Ok she never said she Loved me until she ran back to me full steam. It
was the first night we got back together. She was stubborn, and so was I so it took a while. Anyway, that was a
while ago. She always played alot of games that were kinda silly. I got tired of it. So I played a bigger game and
acted as if I was truly involved with someone eles after we had an arguement. Wouldn't even return her calls after
she tried to contact me a few times. She found another dude, and got married before I knew it and I really wasn't
even totally digging who I was starting to see but was doing it for spite. So this is kinda why I feel games get you
no-where. At the time I was flustered over it. After a short while I knew we were never really gonna make it anyway.
lol Now, I have no ill will to her. Seen her a few times and I had no feelings for her. It wasn't a surprise to me.
I knew the way I felt anyhow. It was past. She KNEW it and even tried to act flirty. I looked at her dead in the
eyes and laughed cause I couldn't believe she would still try and play the role. Geez.
Anyway,
it's
all good. Keep the posts rolling in the future.
"Happy Again"
CptKipling
03-23-2006, 08:32 AM
And I was referring to the
second line of what I quoted of Mobes.
Like I was implying, I still don't think you entirely "get it". Take
that as you will, I'm not trying to be hurtful (neither was Mobes) I'm just calling it as I read it.
Whitehall
03-23-2006, 05:55 PM
One
seduces a woman when you have no moral OK to have sex with her yet to try to manipulate her feelings clandestinely
to do what she really ought not do.
When you "hit" on a woman, she knows what your intents are and can make
an informed decision about her response.
Answer: don't seduce; act like a man and they will be hitting on
you or waiting for you to hit on them.
Having them wait is not a bad thing. It adds sexual
tension.
If she's not buying your mojo, move on.
phersurf
03-23-2006, 06:55 PM
One seduces a
woman when you have no moral OK to have sex with her yet to try to manipulate her feelings clandestinely to do what
she really ought not do.
When you "hit" on a woman, she knows what your intents are and can make an informed
decision about her response.
Answer: don't seduce; act like a man and they will be hitting on you or waiting
for you to hit on them.
Having them wait is not a bad thing. It adds sexual tension.
If she's not
buying your mojo, move on.
I disagree!
Seduction itself is outside of morality. It's just the
process of trying to meet, attract, and yes, bed women. The mechanism you use to accomplish the seduction is where
the morality comes in.
During my seduction, if I try to get a woman to do things she does not want, or take
advantage of her being intoxicated, then I would be imoral.
But if I seduce her with confidence combined
with techniques (cocky-funny, negs, kino, etc) that cause her to become attracted to me to the point I am able to
sleep with her, where's the imorality?
tounge
03-23-2006, 07:03 PM
But if I
seduce her with confidence combined with techniques (cocky-funny, negs, kino, etc) that cause her to become
attracted to me to the point I am able to sleep with her, where's the imorality?
So
Dave. If you and I and 6 other guys are cocky-funny, use some neg hits and kino and exude much confidence to the
same gal, we will all be able to get that girl's panties off?
Gegogi
03-23-2006, 08:26 PM
But if I seduce her with
confidence combined with techniques (cocky-funny, negs, kino, etc) that cause her to become attracted to me to the
point I am able to sleep with her, where's the imorality?
Seduction involves using irresistible charms
to draw a woman away from her choosen path, be it chastity, studying for a final, fidelity to her husband/BF or
religious-moral principles. Herein lies the immorality for some. Personally I see this as a gray area and the
immorality is hidden in the details. There is a difference between seducing a married woman, especially if she puts
up resistance, or willing and attracted single woman. Shamefully I've seduced my share of born-again Christians and
married women and, although they were initially resistant, I was able to draw them out and put them through a lot of
heartache later.
phersurf
03-24-2006, 12:39 PM
So Dave. If you
and I and 6 other guys are cocky-funny, use some neg hits and kino and exude much confidence to the same gal, we
will all be able to get that girl's panties off?
Obviously, no!
First of all I was
only trying to make a point that seduction itself is not imoral. Saying that seduction is imoral is like saying
getting rich is imoral. There are moral and imoral ways to get rich, just like there's moral and imoral ways (and
people) to seduce.
And of course, no matter how good someone is, this stuff isn't magic. It just increases
your chances. So if getting phone numbers is your goal, instead of getting maybe 1 out of 10, maybe you can increase
it to 3 out of 10.
But I can tell you without doubt that I can show you 6 guys of average to slightly better
than average looks, well groomed, with decent jobs that will do consistantly better than 6 good looking guys with no
game.
CptKipling
03-24-2006, 05:55 PM
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=seduction
n
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=seduce
Highlights:
"enticing someone astray from right behavior"
but that's just semantics
phersurf
03-24-2006, 05:58 PM
Other highlights:
To win
over; attract
CptKipling
03-24-2006, 06:13 PM
Yeah I know, but the word
"seduce" DOES have subversive connotations.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.