Sir Louis
01-09-2005, 10:38 AM
FINGERS:
http://human-nature.com/nibbs/02/manning.html
http://love-scent.com/f
orum/showthread.php?t=9591
PHYSICAL
TRAITS:
http://pherolibrary.com/forum/showthread.php?p=100041&highlight=masculinized#post100041
r
" Women's sensitivity to -rone, and therefore their response to it, will vary with levels of hormones. The
trick is to avoid having too much of it most of the time. Too much for a more feminine heterosexual woman, might not
be too much for a more masculine heterosexual woman. I hope we hear of some results in this regard. BTW, there's
nothing wrong with more masculine heterosexual woman; they can be much more fun because they tend to be a bit more
aggressive, and also tend to have two peaks in their drive: one at ovulation, another just before their period
starts. Pay attention to body type: a more masculinized heterosexual woman will show signs of slightly broader
shoulder width (very slightly), less fat distribution in the hips, thighs, and butt, and have smaller breasts--all
due to more testosterone and less estrogen. The tendency also is for these women to be 5'5'' plus rather than the
shorter profile of women with more estrogen. All of the preceeding is based on my own experience, but follows the
biological facts (progesterone before the start of menses can have effects like testosterone in women). I'm certain
that other Forum members can attest to the differences in body type that correlate with sexual behavior. If not, it
should be fun for others to learn about such differences. But, watch out for large, thick-waisted women; a more
masculinized extreme. They're less likely to like guys." JVK
Thanks. I didn't see this post by him.
Where do I start; this makes a tremendous deal of sense, and only reinforces my simple observations. So why are
people making such a mountain out of a molehill with mixtures and other nonsense? If you plan on attracting a woman
with higher than normal estrogen levels (I have tried, many many times...) wearing -none, I would really like to
watch. In fact I would throw $50 down that even if you were a good-looking guy, if the woman had clearly all
beta-female traits, she would be repelled like a magnet.
I greatly prefer feminine over more aggressive and
competitive alpha women, so the question is raised: do compounds exist that are as appealing to a woman with high
estrogen as -none, -nol and -rone is to women with higher testosterone levels?
http://human-nature.com/nibbs/02/manning.html
http://love-scent.com/f
orum/showthread.php?t=9591
PHYSICAL
TRAITS:
http://pherolibrary.com/forum/showthread.php?p=100041&highlight=masculinized#post100041
r
" Women's sensitivity to -rone, and therefore their response to it, will vary with levels of hormones. The
trick is to avoid having too much of it most of the time. Too much for a more feminine heterosexual woman, might not
be too much for a more masculine heterosexual woman. I hope we hear of some results in this regard. BTW, there's
nothing wrong with more masculine heterosexual woman; they can be much more fun because they tend to be a bit more
aggressive, and also tend to have two peaks in their drive: one at ovulation, another just before their period
starts. Pay attention to body type: a more masculinized heterosexual woman will show signs of slightly broader
shoulder width (very slightly), less fat distribution in the hips, thighs, and butt, and have smaller breasts--all
due to more testosterone and less estrogen. The tendency also is for these women to be 5'5'' plus rather than the
shorter profile of women with more estrogen. All of the preceeding is based on my own experience, but follows the
biological facts (progesterone before the start of menses can have effects like testosterone in women). I'm certain
that other Forum members can attest to the differences in body type that correlate with sexual behavior. If not, it
should be fun for others to learn about such differences. But, watch out for large, thick-waisted women; a more
masculinized extreme. They're less likely to like guys." JVK
Thanks. I didn't see this post by him.
Where do I start; this makes a tremendous deal of sense, and only reinforces my simple observations. So why are
people making such a mountain out of a molehill with mixtures and other nonsense? If you plan on attracting a woman
with higher than normal estrogen levels (I have tried, many many times...) wearing -none, I would really like to
watch. In fact I would throw $50 down that even if you were a good-looking guy, if the woman had clearly all
beta-female traits, she would be repelled like a magnet.
I greatly prefer feminine over more aggressive and
competitive alpha women, so the question is raised: do compounds exist that are as appealing to a woman with high
estrogen as -none, -nol and -rone is to women with higher testosterone levels?